Rise in Wiretapping Litigation Should Prompt Dealers to Audit Their Data Tracking Tools

Sarah J. Reusché and Mitchell J. Parker • January 5, 2026
Accept All Cookies button on a website.


Dealerships, like many businesses in today’s data-driven market, use various tracking technologies such as session replay software, cookies, pixels, chatbots, pen registers, geotargeting or geofencing tools, and other related technologies to collect, track, and store personal data from consumers when they visit the dealership’s website. These tools and technologies are designed to enhance the user experience and improve dealers’ marketing, but their use is becoming increasingly risky as consumers grow progressively more aware of how their personal data is being collected and used.


The past two years have brought an increase in class action litigation against auto dealers alleging that the use of these tools constitutes illegal wiretapping or unauthorized recording of consumer activities and communications without consent in violation of state wiretapping laws. It is important that Illinois automobile dealers, and Wisconsin dealers that service Illinois consumers, fully understand this growing trend and take the proper steps to minimize their risk.


Class Action Litigation under State Wiretapping Laws


Several recent cases involving California’s Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”) highlight this trend. California is a so-called “two-party consent” state, and under the CIPA, any party seeking to record an audio or text-based conversation must obtain consent from all parties to be recorded, no matter where the other parties are located. The California plaintiffs filing these claims allege certain tracking tools on dealership websites, including cookies, session replay tools, or chat modules, violate state and federal wiretapping laws by tracking or recording interactions with consumers without their consent. California residents are filing these actions against dealers in states other than California, demonstrating this issue affects any dealership doing business with consumers located in a two-party consent state, regardless of that state’s own wiretapping laws.

 

Like California, Illinois is a two-party consent state. It is increasingly likely that Illinois dealers, or dealers in Wisconsin that service Illinois consumers, could face similar litigation under the Illinois Eavesdropping Statute, 720 ILCS 5/14-1, et seq. A successful claim could subject a dealer to injunctive relief and actual and punitive damages. See 720 ILCS 5/14-6. Therefore, it is important that Illinois dealers and Wisconsin dealers that service Illinois consumers review their data tracking tools to mitigate risk.


How Dealers Can Protect Themselves


Dealers must fully understand what tools are being used on their websites, exactly what data those tools collect, and how that data is stored and protected. Even if a dealer knows such tools exist, they may not fully understand how they operate, what information they gather, and where such information is shared. For example, one specific feature many plaintiffs have identified in the California class actions is Google Analytics, which may share customer data without the dealer fully knowing how it operates.


Dealers must also clearly inform customers what specific tools they are using on their website and give customers the option to consent to their use. Two critically important items to customer consent are the cookie consent banner and a robust privacy policy. First, a cookie consent banner requires a customer to click “accept” before a cookie or tracking pixel can load. Second, a dealer must update its website’s privacy policy to include language disclosing the use of any data-collection tools and what information those tools collect. Simply understanding the tools being used and implementing proper cookie consent banners and privacy policies will help dealers adequately minimize their litigation risk.


Takeaway



If you are an auto dealer concerned about the risk of facing class action litigation from the use of consumer tracking technology, it is important that you fully understand the data-collection and consumer tracking tools in use on your website and take the proper steps to minimize your risk by disclosing the use of such tools to your consumers and implementing the proper consents.


Should you have additional questions regarding this subject matter, or wish to consult an attorney regarding possible data-privacy litigation faced by your dealership, please call Lavelle Law at 847-705-7555 or email Attorneys Sarah Reusché (sreusche@lavellelaw.com) or Mitchell Parker (mparker@lavellelaw.com) to schedule your free and confidential one-hour consultation.

 


More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

BOI reports with FinCEN no longer required for condo, HOAs, other associations, board members.
By Robyn K. Kish August 17, 2026
FinCEN update: Condo, HOAs, and other common interest community associations no longer have to file BOI reports with FinCEN. Volunteer board members are no longer required to report their personal information to the federal government simply because they sit on an association’s board of directors.
Tax-Smart Year-End Planning: Key 2026 Tax Changes & Strategies for Success
By Lavelle Law August 11, 2026
Discover the latest tax law updates and planning opportunities that can help you reduce taxes, protect wealth, and prepare for the future.
IRS Announces Guidance on the Expansion of Paid Family and Medical Leave
By Timothy M. Hughes August 10, 2026
On August 5, 2026, the Internal Revenue Service issued Notice 2026-28 providing guidance on the employer credit for paid family and medical leave (“PFML”) under the Working Families Tax Cuts (“WFTC”). The WFTC makes permanent and expands eligibility and coverage for employers offering PFML benefits to employees.
Federal Rule 68 Offers of Judgment: An Underutilized Tool for Defense Counsel
By Sarah J. Reusché August 7, 2026
Many litigators are familiar with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68, but few fully appreciate its strategic value in the defense arsenal. Rule 68 can be a powerful tool for influencing settlement negotiations, and in some cases, limiting a plaintiff’s ability to recover post-offer attorneys’ fees.
Judge Says “You’re Out!” to Stalker Ex  - a Lavelle Law Success Story
By Family Law Practice Group July 28, 2026
A client came to us needing protection from an ex-boyfriend who wouldn’t take no for an answer. She broke up with him after he used her indoor pet camera to spy on her without her permission, then surveilled her at her home and chased her through a parking lot.
Type F Reorganization
By Frank J. Portera July 28, 2026
Thinking about selling your business? In this video, Lavelle Law attorney Frank Portera explains how a Type F Reorganization can create tax efficiencies and simplify the sale process by reducing the need for third-party consents.
6 reasons why you shouldn’t rely on AI for legal advice.
By Sarah J. Reusché and Shelley McCarthy July 17, 2026
Thinking about using AI to represent yourself in litigation? Think again. It is well-documented that pro se litigants are less likely to prevail compared to their represented counterparts. Regardless, AI has provided people with a false sense of security, tempting them to represent themselves regardless.
Representation and Warranties Insurance Democratization: A Game Changer for Many Deals
By Steven A. Migala July 13, 2026
Representations and warranties insurance (“RWI”) for mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) is more accessible than ever due to increasing democratization in the market. Now, RWI can be a viable option for smaller, mid-market deals.
IRS Announces Simplified Penalty Relief
By Timothy M. Hughes July 10, 2026
On July 8, 2026, the Internal Revenue Service announced a new automatic process to provide penalty relief for taxpayers with a history of filing and paying on time, reducing the need for those taxpayers to request assistance in addressing penalty relief.
NDAs in the Spotlight: What Swift and Kelce’s Wedding Reveals About Protecting Your Privacy.
By Theodore M. McGinn June 30, 2026
High-profile couples like Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce are taking strict steps to protect their privacy. Reports confirm that wedding guests must sign non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) before receiving event details. This highlights how NDAs help individuals and businesses safeguard sensitive information.
More Posts