Rise in Wiretapping Litigation Should Prompt Dealers to Audit Their Data Tracking Tools

Sarah J. Reusché and Mitchell J. Parker • January 5, 2026
Accept All Cookies button on a website.


Dealerships, like many businesses in today’s data-driven market, use various tracking technologies such as session replay software, cookies, pixels, chatbots, pen registers, geotargeting or geofencing tools, and other related technologies to collect, track, and store personal data from consumers when they visit the dealership’s website. These tools and technologies are designed to enhance the user experience and improve dealers’ marketing, but their use is becoming increasingly risky as consumers grow progressively more aware of how their personal data is being collected and used.


The past two years have brought an increase in class action litigation against auto dealers alleging that the use of these tools constitutes illegal wiretapping or unauthorized recording of consumer activities and communications without consent in violation of state wiretapping laws. It is important that Illinois automobile dealers, and Wisconsin dealers that service Illinois consumers, fully understand this growing trend and take the proper steps to minimize their risk.


Class Action Litigation under State Wiretapping Laws


Several recent cases involving California’s Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”) highlight this trend. California is a so-called “two-party consent” state, and under the CIPA, any party seeking to record an audio or text-based conversation must obtain consent from all parties to be recorded, no matter where the other parties are located. The California plaintiffs filing these claims allege certain tracking tools on dealership websites, including cookies, session replay tools, or chat modules, violate state and federal wiretapping laws by tracking or recording interactions with consumers without their consent. California residents are filing these actions against dealers in states other than California, demonstrating this issue affects any dealership doing business with consumers located in a two-party consent state, regardless of that state’s own wiretapping laws.

 

Like California, Illinois is a two-party consent state. It is increasingly likely that Illinois dealers, or dealers in Wisconsin that service Illinois consumers, could face similar litigation under the Illinois Eavesdropping Statute, 720 ILCS 5/14-1, et seq. A successful claim could subject a dealer to injunctive relief and actual and punitive damages. See 720 ILCS 5/14-6. Therefore, it is important that Illinois dealers and Wisconsin dealers that service Illinois consumers review their data tracking tools to mitigate risk.


How Dealers Can Protect Themselves


Dealers must fully understand what tools are being used on their websites, exactly what data those tools collect, and how that data is stored and protected. Even if a dealer knows such tools exist, they may not fully understand how they operate, what information they gather, and where such information is shared. For example, one specific feature many plaintiffs have identified in the California class actions is Google Analytics, which may share customer data without the dealer fully knowing how it operates.


Dealers must also clearly inform customers what specific tools they are using on their website and give customers the option to consent to their use. Two critically important items to customer consent are the cookie consent banner and a robust privacy policy. First, a cookie consent banner requires a customer to click “accept” before a cookie or tracking pixel can load. Second, a dealer must update its website’s privacy policy to include language disclosing the use of any data-collection tools and what information those tools collect. Simply understanding the tools being used and implementing proper cookie consent banners and privacy policies will help dealers adequately minimize their litigation risk.


Takeaway



If you are an auto dealer concerned about the risk of facing class action litigation from the use of consumer tracking technology, it is important that you fully understand the data-collection and consumer tracking tools in use on your website and take the proper steps to minimize your risk by disclosing the use of such tools to your consumers and implementing the proper consents.


Should you have additional questions regarding this subject matter, or wish to consult an attorney regarding possible data-privacy litigation faced by your dealership, please call Lavelle Law at 847-705-7555 or email Attorneys Sarah Reusché (sreusche@lavellelaw.com) or Mitchell Parker (mparker@lavellelaw.com) to schedule your free and confidential one-hour consultation.

 


More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

Join our session to learn legal tips for successfully launching or growing a business!
By Lavelle Law April 3, 2026
Launching or growing a business? Don’t get tripped up by the legal stuff that can make or break you. Join us for this free seminar on May 13, 2026, and learn key legal tips for entrepreneurs.
Experienced business attorney Kerry Lavelle breaks down the three main avenues for buying a business
By Kerry M. Lavelle March 24, 2026
Thinking about buying a business? There’s more than one way to do it, and choosing the right path can save you time, money, and headaches. In this video, experienced business attorney Kerry Lavelle breaks down the three main avenues for buying a business, along with the pros and cons of each.
Lessons from the Chance the Rapper Manager Dispute
By Anthony V. Letto March 19, 2026
A lawsuit involving Chance the Rapper and his former manager, Pat Corcoran, highlights a costly lesson for businesses, creatives, and entrepreneurs alike: handshake deals can lead to million-dollar disputes.
Lavelle Saves Client $330K with Strategic Timing and Collaboration
By Tax Group March 18, 2026
Our client was haunted by non-dischargeable federal tax liabilities of over $400K from a business venture. After strategic timing and working with our Bankruptcy team, $330K was written off by the IRS before we filed Chapter 7 for the client, and he suffered no adverse results from the four-month delay.
Join Lavelle Law on April 9, for our Business After Hours!
By Team Lavelle March 13, 2026
Play Ball with Lavelle Law on April 9! Step up to the plate and join our annual Business After Hours event, hosted in the friendly confines of our Schaumburg office. Bonus points: Feel free to rock your favorite baseball team’s gear and show off your fandom while you’re at it! Free event for SBA members!
IRS Announces its Dirty Dozen Tax Scams for 2026
By Timothy M. Hughes March 10, 2026
The IRS announced its annual Dirty Dozen list of tax scams for 2026 that threaten the tax and financial information of taxpayers, businesses, and tax professionals. The Dirty Dozen is part of a broader campaign conducted by the IRS to educate taxpayers about identity theft schemes and other forms of fraud.
New Illinois Employment Laws for 2026
By Lance C. Ziebell and Sarah J. Reusché February 19, 2026
Lavelle Law seminar highlighted key 2026 Illinois employment laws for employers: expanded Workplace Transparency Act rules, AI discrimination bans in hiring, paid nursing breaks, broader state employee insurance, & upcoming neonatal ICU leave.
New guidance on how businesses can take advantage of the return of 100 percent bonus depreciation.
By Frank J. Portera and Anthony V. Letto February 16, 2026
For many businesses, the ability to fully expense capital investments in the first year presents a meaningful opportunity to reduce tax liability and reinvest in growth. Proper classification, timing, and election planning remain essential to maximizing the benefit.
New FinCEN Reporting Rule for Certain Residential Real Estate Transactions
By Steven A. Migala February 10, 2026
Beginning 3.1.26, new federal regulations issued by FinCEN will significantly affect how certain residential real estate closings are handled. Issued under the authority of the Bank Secrecy Act, the rule requires the reporting of specified non-financed residential real estate transfers involving legal entities & trusts
Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge Taxpayer’s Questionable Tax Liabilities
By Timothy M. Hughes February 10, 2026
Certain income taxes can be discharged in bankruptcy if they meet a four-part test, the last test being a subjective test. On January 20, 2026, Judge Bentley of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the SDNY issued a 46-page judgment determining that a chapter 7 debtor did not meet the fourth test.
More Posts