Election Law

ELECTION LAW

The candidates’ choice for legal guidance

If you are a candidate for local, state or federal office, a visit with the Election Law attorneys at Lavelle Law can set your campaign on the proper course. A thorough election law review begins with the proper filing of your nominating petitions in order to prevent signature challenges and other potential electoral board disputes. During your campaign, you must maintain appropriate campaign disclosure documents and file required campaign financing reports; you may even encounter issues related to Political Action Committees. 

With increasing regularity, election law matters arise when there are challenges to election results, ballot canvassing, or election recounts. The Election Law attorneys at Lavelle Law can provide immediate and focused assistance to any election result challenges. Our diverse group of attorneys have held office on a variety of Village Boards, Plan Commissions, Boards of Appeal, and other government entities. We take very seriously the trust you place in us as election law counselors and advisors and are determined to help your candidacy be successful.

Our Services

  • Ballot Canvassing
  • Campaign Disclosure Consultation and Compliance
  • Campaign Finance
  • Contested Election Results
  • Election Appeals
  • Electoral Board Disputes
  • Federal and State Election Commission Complaints
  • Legal Compliance for Nomination Petitions
  • Nomination Petition Appeals
  • Nomination Petition Challenges
  • Political Action Committees
  • Recounts
  • Signature Challenges

OUR ELECTION LAW TEAM

Election Law Posts

Lavelle Law News and Events

Navigating Election Law video
By John J. Lydon 06 Oct, 2022
Are you a candidate running for office or thinking about running? In Illinois, there are over 1,300 municipal governments and hundreds of state offices, each of which field multiple candidates. In this video, election law attorney, Jack Lydon, provides an overview of election law and describes how he can assist you and your campaign.
By Joseph V. Vito and Clay Dant 19 Nov, 2020
The 2020 presidential election has generated national discussion around the concept of election recounts. A key component to the conversation around recounts is an actual understanding of the nuanced process of election recounts, including what triggers a recount, how a recount is done, and what the end result of a recount could entail. Election recounts have been present throughout U.S. history at every level, from local office races to presidential elections. Each state has its own laws governing election recounts, which vary significantly from one another. Specific to us here, Illinois takes a fairly unique approach to the election recount procedure.
By Joseph V. Vito 01 May, 2019
Running for local office is a daunting task, especially for those trying their hand for the first time. The first step in running for office is to prepare your nomination petitions. While most candidates are familiar with obtaining the requisite signatures to get on the ballot, it is important to understand the pitfalls, challenges, and often-petty objections you might face upon filing your nomination petition. Of course, everyone understands that there is a minimum amount of signatures required to get on the ballot, however, most local races also have a “maximum” amount of signatures allowed, which is usually computed as 8% of the total ballots cast in last election for the same office. The local electoral board will ignore any signature over the 8% threshold even if there was an insufficient amount of valid signatures before the 8% threshold was reached. Therefore, it is important to insure that all petitions signers are valid, registered voters, who are able to vote for the office in which you are running. In addition, it is best practice not to exceed the maximum amount of signatures; because you might face a challenge (although constitutionally improper), claiming that too many signatures invalidates the entirety of your petition. While courts have held that a candidate cannot have too many signatures, that still might not prevent someone from raising an erroneous challenge which you will have to defend. As noted above, some the common challenges are often very petty. For instance, nomination petitions are often challenged based on the manner in which they were bound. The law requires that the petitions “be neatly fastened together in book form by fastening them together at one edge in a secure and suitable manner.” 10 ILCS 5/7-10. Of course, the law does not specifically dictate what type of binding is acceptable. However, case law interpreting the statute has found that as long as the integrity of the petition papers cannot be destroyed without removing the binding mechanism, then the petitions are properly bound. Therefore, paperclips and binder clips should be avoided in favor of hole punched Acco style prong fasteners or larger secure staples. Opposing candidates will look for any possible way to challenge your petition and keep you off the ballot, so it is best to make sure you do not open yourself up to petty and easily avoidable challenges. In that vein, make sure that each signature page is properly numbered, notarized and completed by the correct circulator. Failure to number your petition pages consecutively will result in an automatic striking of your petition. Similarly, failure to notarize and have each signature page completed properly could result in a full invalidation of your petition packet. In sum, be educated and aware of the pitfalls of the nomination petition process. Spending time fighting a petition challenge, whether petty or substantial, takes time, energy, and money away from critical campaigning. The traps and snares of the process are easily avoided, especially if you take the time to have your petitions reviewed by a qualified election attorney before filing. If you have any questions on this matter or election law in general, please contact Joe Vito at jvito@lavellelaw.com or at 847-705-7555.
More Posts
Share by: