Recounts and Challenging Election Results in Illinois

Joseph V. Vito and Clay Dant • November 19, 2020

The 2020 presidential election has generated national discussion around the concept of election recounts. A key component to the conversation around recounts is an actual understanding of the nuanced process of election recounts, including what triggers a recount, how a recount is done, and what the end result of a recount could entail. Election recounts have been present throughout U.S. history at every level, from local office races to presidential elections. Each state has its own laws governing election recounts, which vary significantly from one another. Specific to us here, Illinois takes a fairly unique approach to the election recount procedure.


Illinois is one of 30 states that has no law mandating an automatic recount. For any recount to take place, it must be triggered by request. Illinois laws set a high bar for the request, however. A losing candidate must petition for a recount within 5 days after the results of a canvass have been announced. Additionally, a losing candidate can only petition for a recount if he/she received at least 95% of the votes that the winning candidate received. Alternatively, if the losing candidate does not petition for a recount, 5 registered voters in the area can petition for a recount on the losing candidate’s behalf if he/she meets the 95% vote requirement. Even if a candidate meets the requirements and petitions for a recount, Illinois law classifies this recount as a “discovery recount,” which cannot change the results of an election. The discovery recount results only inform a candidate of the results, and can subsequently be used by that candidate in an election contest proceeding in court.


As indicated above, a candidate who wishes to challenge the results of an election must do so by petitioning an Illinois court, contesting the election by alleging that the results were incorrect, either through fraud, mistake, or some other irregularity. The type of election will determine which court has jurisdiction. The court, after receiving the petition, will hold a hearing to determine which jurisdictions, if any, should hold a court-ordered recount. This is where a candidate may use the results of the discovery recount to support his/her challenge. Ultimately, a court order is the only method by which an Illinois election result can be changed.


In sum, Illinois laws make it fairly difficult for a challenging candidate to trigger a recount, let alone change the results of an election. That is why it is so important for anyone wishing to run for office in Illinois to fully understand this process, as well as those wishing to be informed Illinois voters. Complete details on Illinois election laws are located in the Illinois Election Code in Chapter 10 of the Illinois Compiled Statutes. If you have any questions on the recount process in Illinois or election law in general, please contact Joe Vito at jvito@lavellelaw.com or 847-705-7555.


More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

The Junk Fee Ban Act and pricing transparency legislation.
By Sarah J. Reusché and Jacob Rotolo April 23, 2025
If enacted, the Junk Fee Ban Act would protect consumers from hidden fees and promote fair business practices in Illinois. While there has yet to be legislation in the proposed Junk Fee Ban Act that excludes dealerships, it will be important to look for future updates on this bill, as Illinois is quickly becoming a hub for vehicle innovation and automotive plant expansion.
Ancillary probate is required when a person dies owning real estate outside of their home state.
By Heather A. McCollum April 21, 2025
When someone passes away owning property in another state, their estate may need to go through ancillary probate—a secondary court process in that state.
$9.9 Million Dollar Purchase of Packaged Multi-Unit Properties
By Commercial Real Estate April 18, 2025
Lavelle Law represented a joint venture in its $9.9 million acquisition of four multi-unit buildings.
Type F Reorg offers a means of achieving structural change while preserving tax continuity
By Steven A. Migala and Nathan P. Toy April 14, 2025
A Type F reorganization (“F Reorg”), governed by Section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Internal Revenue Code, provides a strategically significant mechanism for corporate restructuring. Defined as a “mere change in identity, form, or place of organization of one corporation,” an F Reorg permits a corporation to alter its legal existence while being treated for federal tax purposes as the same entity. This recharacterization allows for the uninterrupted preservation of tax attributes while maintaining shareholder continuity.
Estate Planning for Your Pet: Securing Your Pet’s Future with a Pet Trust
By Jackie R. Luthringshausen April 10, 2025
When it comes to estate planning, most people think about providing for their loved ones—but what about the furry, feathered, or scaled members of your family? In the United States, 68% of households own at least one pet, according to the American Pet Products Association’s 2023-2024 National Pet Owners Survey. For many, pets are more than just companions—they’re family. Ensuring their care after your death or incapacity is a vital part of comprehensive estate planning. In Illinois, a Pet Trust offers a powerful solution to guarantee your pet’s well-being long after you’re gone.
IRS Press Release Addresses Payment Plan Options
By Timothy M. Hughes April 10, 2025
IRS Press Release Addresses Payment Plan Options - A recent press release by the IRS addressed the options that are available to taxpayers who may owe more on April 15th than they can pay. The IRS advised taxpayers that they do not need to wait until April 15 to file their 2024 federal return, and if they owe and are unable to pay the balance in full, there are payment plans available to help them pay their tax obligation.
Learn about essential legal protections to strengthen your business and safeguard your interests.
By Lavelle Law April 9, 2025
Join us on May 21 in Schaumburg for an engaging Breakfast Briefs seminar, delving into vital strategies to fortify your business. This session will explore the critical role of crafting ironclad non-compete agreements, shielding your trade secrets, and mastering the nuances of temporary restraining orders (TROs) and injunctive relief. Our presenters, attorneys Matthew Sheahin and Jennifer Tee, bring a wealth of experience in this legal domain. Seize this chance to bolster your company’s legal protections and lay a solid groundwork for enduring success!
FinCEN Eliminates BOI Reporting Obligations!
By Frank P. Portera March 25, 2025
On March 21, 2025, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued its interim final rule stating that those entities previously classified as "domestic reporting companies" are now exempt from all BOI reporting requirements. On the other hand, all foreign entities registered to do business in the USA must file their own initial BOI reports within 30 days of the initial final rule's publication, if they have not done so already.
Join us April 3, 2025 for Business After Hours 5-7 PM
By Lavelle Law March 19, 2025
Spring is here, and with baseball season kicking off, we’re stepping up to the plate with our annual Lavelle Law Business After Hours event. We’re excited to partner with our friends in the Schaumburg business community for an evening of networking, good vibes, and a few surprises—all hosted in the friendly confines of our Schaumburg office. Bonus points: Feel free to rock your favorite baseball team’s gear and show off your fandom while you’re at it!
Delaware Court  Provides the Standard of Supreme Review for the Redomestication of Corporations
By Steven A. Migala and Anthony Letto March 12, 2025
Delaware corporations seeking to redomesticate to another state should be advised that on February 4, 2025, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Palkon v. Maffei, C.A. No. 2023-0449-JTL, addressing a challenge to TripAdvisor's redomestication from a Delaware corporation to a Nevada corporation. The case raised important questions regarding the standard of review applicable to such reincorporations, particularly when fiduciaries may derive a benefit from shifting to a legal regime perceived as more friendly.
More Posts