New Illinois Child Support Law: Closing Loopholes on Voluntary Unemployment

Joseph A. Olszowka • February 27, 2025


The Illinois legislature has recently taken a significant step in closing a longstanding loophole in child support. This amendment represents a pivotal change in how courts assess and calculate child support obligations, providing greater protections against those who attempt to evade their financial responsibilities.


Previous Challenges in Child Support Enforcement


Historically, Illinois law lacked a clear statutory directive for handling cases where a parent deliberately chose not to work or earned significantly below their capacity to reduce child support obligations. Courts could consider voluntary unemployment or underemployment on a case-by-case basis, but there was no uniform rule requiring the imputation of income. This led to inconsistencies in how courts addressed parents who manipulated their employment status to avoid paying fair child support.


The lack of clear statutory language often resulted in protracted litigation, as custodial parents sought to prove that the other parent was intentionally earning less than they were capable of. The burden of proof on custodial parents was significant, and many payors were able to successfully argue that their lower income was legitimate, despite evidence suggesting otherwise. This loophole created financial hardships for children who depended on child support for their well-being.


New Statutory Provisions on Potential Income


The recent amendment to the Illinois child support statute introduces Section (3.2a) Unemployment or Underemployment, which explicitly empowers courts to calculate child support based on a parent’s potential income rather than just their reported earnings. The statute provides a structured approach to determine a parent's earning capacity by considering multiple factors, including but not limited to:


  • The parent's assets and substantial non-income producing assets;
  • Their residence and standard of living;
  • Employment and earning history;
  • Job skills and educational background;
  • Literacy, age, and health;
  • Criminal records and employment barriers;
  • Record of seeking work;
  • The availability of local jobs and prevailing earning levels.


Additionally, if a parent has insufficient work history to determine their probable earnings, courts will apply a rebuttable presumption that their potential income is 75% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines for a single-person household. This ensures that even in cases where past employment records are lacking, courts have a baseline for calculating child support.


Key Implications of the Amendment


With this new provision, Illinois courts now have statutory authority to address bad faith attempts to evade child support by remaining unemployed or underemployed. This amendment:


  1. Reduces Legal Ambiguity – Courts now have a clear mandate to assess potential income, leading to more consistent rulings.
  2. Protects Children’s Financial Interests – By imputing income based on ability rather than actual earnings, courts can ensure that children receive the support they need.
  3. Discourages Bad Faith Employment Decisions – Parents can no longer manipulate the system by choosing not to work or taking significantly lower-paying jobs to reduce their obligations.
  4. Establishes a Fair Standard – The consideration of multiple factors ensures that the determination of potential income is equitable and based on realistic earning potential.


It is also important to note that incarceration is explicitly excluded from being considered voluntary unemployment when establishing or modifying child support obligations. This clarification prevents undue hardship on individuals who are unable to work due to incarceration.


What This Means for Parents


For custodial parents seeking child support, this change provides stronger legal footing to argue for a fair assessment of support obligations. For paying parents, it reinforces the importance of making genuine efforts to maintain employment and fulfill financial responsibilities toward their children.


If you have questions about how this change might impact you or your child support case please contact Joseph Olszowka at jolszowka@lavellelaw.com or 847-241-1783.

More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

BOI reports with FinCEN no longer required for condo, HOAs, other associations, board members.
By Robyn K. Kish August 17, 2026
FinCEN update: Condo, HOAs, and other common interest community associations no longer have to file BOI reports with FinCEN. Volunteer board members are no longer required to report their personal information to the federal government simply because they sit on an association’s board of directors.
Tax-Smart Year-End Planning: Key 2026 Tax Changes & Strategies for Success
By Lavelle Law August 11, 2026
Discover the latest tax law updates and planning opportunities that can help you reduce taxes, protect wealth, and prepare for the future.
IRS Announces Guidance on the Expansion of Paid Family and Medical Leave
By Timothy M. Hughes August 10, 2026
On August 5, 2026, the Internal Revenue Service issued Notice 2026-28 providing guidance on the employer credit for paid family and medical leave (“PFML”) under the Working Families Tax Cuts (“WFTC”). The WFTC makes permanent and expands eligibility and coverage for employers offering PFML benefits to employees.
Federal Rule 68 Offers of Judgment: An Underutilized Tool for Defense Counsel
By Sarah J. Reusché August 7, 2026
Many litigators are familiar with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68, but few fully appreciate its strategic value in the defense arsenal. Rule 68 can be a powerful tool for influencing settlement negotiations, and in some cases, limiting a plaintiff’s ability to recover post-offer attorneys’ fees.
Judge Says “You’re Out!” to Stalker Ex  - a Lavelle Law Success Story
By Family Law Practice Group July 28, 2026
A client came to us needing protection from an ex-boyfriend who wouldn’t take no for an answer. She broke up with him after he used her indoor pet camera to spy on her without her permission, then surveilled her at her home and chased her through a parking lot.
Type F Reorganization
By Frank J. Portera July 28, 2026
Thinking about selling your business? In this video, Lavelle Law attorney Frank Portera explains how a Type F Reorganization can create tax efficiencies and simplify the sale process by reducing the need for third-party consents.
6 reasons why you shouldn’t rely on AI for legal advice.
By Sarah J. Reusché and Shelley McCarthy July 17, 2026
Thinking about using AI to represent yourself in litigation? Think again. It is well-documented that pro se litigants are less likely to prevail compared to their represented counterparts. Regardless, AI has provided people with a false sense of security, tempting them to represent themselves regardless.
Representation and Warranties Insurance Democratization: A Game Changer for Many Deals
By Steven A. Migala July 13, 2026
Representations and warranties insurance (“RWI”) for mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) is more accessible than ever due to increasing democratization in the market. Now, RWI can be a viable option for smaller, mid-market deals.
IRS Announces Simplified Penalty Relief
By Timothy M. Hughes July 10, 2026
On July 8, 2026, the Internal Revenue Service announced a new automatic process to provide penalty relief for taxpayers with a history of filing and paying on time, reducing the need for those taxpayers to request assistance in addressing penalty relief.
NDAs in the Spotlight: What Swift and Kelce’s Wedding Reveals About Protecting Your Privacy.
By Theodore M. McGinn June 30, 2026
High-profile couples like Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce are taking strict steps to protect their privacy. Reports confirm that wedding guests must sign non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) before receiving event details. This highlights how NDAs help individuals and businesses safeguard sensitive information.
More Posts