BIPA Compliance: A Guide for Vehicle Dealerships to Mitigate Litigation Risks

Sarah J. Reusche and Nathan Toy • April 30, 2024
A person is pressing a button on a virtual screen.

In this era of technological innovation, the adoption of biometric data for various applications in the workplace has surged. From fingerprint scans for timekeeping to facial recognition for access control, biometric technology has become a key aspect of modern business operations. However, this integration has also raised privacy and security concerns, leading to legislative responses aimed at protecting individuals' biometric information. At the forefront of this is the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”). 


Vehicle dealerships particularly have recently found themselves needing to navigate the complex terrain of adhering to the BIPA’s stringent requirements to avoid being targeted through lawsuits. There has been a recent noticeable uptick in class action lawsuits under the BIPA, serving as a critical wake-up call for the automotive retail industry, highlighting the need for dealerships to review and enhance their practices if they are using biometric technology. 


Class Action Suits Under the BIPA


BIPA class action lawsuits have targeted employers who use biometric systems to track workers’ paid hours or to control access to secured or sensitive areas in a workplace. An example of this can be seen in this class action lawsuit filed in September of 2023, in which a Chicago area car dealership was accused of violating the BIPA by requiring workers to access a secure vehicle key box at the dealership. Along with granting the employee access to a key, the system created audit trails to identify the employees, and the employees’ biometric information was enrolled and retained in the dealership’s database and cloud system. 


The suit noted that this could expose employees to serious and irreversible privacy risks due to the potential danger of the database being breached, and the employees having no means by which to prevent identity theft and unauthorized tracking. The Plaintiffs also allege that the Defendants violated the BIPA by not properly informing employees of the collection and storage, not providing a publicly available retention schedule and guidelines for the destruction of the fingerprint information, and not obtaining a written release from the employees authorizing the collection and storage of their biometric information. Another example of biometric system usage that could result in such a lawsuit is collecting and storing employee fingerprints for timekeeping purposes. 


How Dealers Can Protect Themselves 


The most effective way for a vehicle dealership to protect themselves is to ensure compliance by being aware of the following issues: 


What disclosures are being made? The BIPA requires a written notice explaining that biometric information will be collected, the purpose for doing so, and the length of time the information will be retained. Creating a clear company policy concerning the collection, use, retention, and security of biometric information will, if done properly and provided to employees, satisfy notice requirements and may also help ease some concerns from employees.


Is a written release being obtained? In addition to providing notice, a “written release” must be obtained prior to collecting and storing an individual’s biometric information to serve as written consent. 


Is there a written policy for retention and deletion? If a company collects or stores biometric data, then it must have a written policy for handling such data. This written policy must include a retention schedule and guidelines for permanently destroying the data when required. 


Enforcement 


The BIPA carries a private right of action for harmed individuals and includes statutory damages of $1,000 per negligent violation and $5,000 per intentional violation, or actual damages, whichever is greater. Additionally, successful plaintiffs may receive reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, and courts can issue an injunction to order the offending party to change their practices to comply with the Act’s requirements. 


Given these harsh penalties and the risk of non-compliance, dealers should contact legal counsel for advice on how to best navigate the BIPA. For further inquiries or questions, please contact attorney Sarah Reusche at sreusche@lavellelaw.com or (847) 705-7555. 


More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

Join Lavelle Law on April 9, for our Business After Hours!
By Team Lavelle March 13, 2026
Play Ball with Lavelle Law on April 9! Step up to the plate and join our annual Business After Hours event, hosted in the friendly confines of our Schaumburg office. Bonus points: Feel free to rock your favorite baseball team’s gear and show off your fandom while you’re at it! Free event for SBA members!
IRS Announces its Dirty Dozen Tax Scams for 2026
By Timothy M. Hughes March 10, 2026
The IRS announced its annual Dirty Dozen list of tax scams for 2026 that threaten the tax and financial information of taxpayers, businesses, and tax professionals. The Dirty Dozen is part of a broader campaign conducted by the IRS to educate taxpayers about identity theft schemes and other forms of fraud.
New Illinois Employment Laws for 2026
By Lance C. Ziebell and Sarah J. Reusché February 19, 2026
Lavelle Law seminar highlighted key 2026 Illinois employment laws for employers: expanded Workplace Transparency Act rules, AI discrimination bans in hiring, paid nursing breaks, broader state employee insurance, & upcoming neonatal ICU leave.
New guidance on how businesses can take advantage of the return of 100 percent bonus depreciation.
By Frank J. Portera and Anthony V. Letto February 16, 2026
For many businesses, the ability to fully expense capital investments in the first year presents a meaningful opportunity to reduce tax liability and reinvest in growth. Proper classification, timing, and election planning remain essential to maximizing the benefit.
New FinCEN Reporting Rule for Certain Residential Real Estate Transactions
By Steven A. Migala February 10, 2026
Beginning 3.1.26, new federal regulations issued by FinCEN will significantly affect how certain residential real estate closings are handled. Issued under the authority of the Bank Secrecy Act, the rule requires the reporting of specified non-financed residential real estate transfers involving legal entities & trusts
Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge Taxpayer’s Questionable Tax Liabilities
By Timothy M. Hughes February 10, 2026
Certain income taxes can be discharged in bankruptcy if they meet a four-part test, the last test being a subjective test. On January 20, 2026, Judge Bentley of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the SDNY issued a 46-page judgment determining that a chapter 7 debtor did not meet the fourth test.
SCOTUS ruled that candidates are allowed to challenge vote-counting rules.
By John J. Lydon and Jacob N. Rotolo February 4, 2026
On January 14, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that political candidates can bring lawsuits over election rules. In Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections, the Court held that a candidate for office has the right to challenge state rules about how votes are counted.
Sarah Reusché is featured in this month's North Shore City Lifestyle!
By North Shore City Lifestyle February 3, 2026
As seen in North Shore City Lifestyle. Lavelle Law attorney, Sarah Reusché, is featured in the February 2026 issue of North Shore City Lifestyle magazine. Sarah isn't just an exceptional attorney; she's a true community advocate.
Success Story - Smooth Acquisition of Fast Food Franchise Assets
By Mergers & Acquisitions February 2, 2026
A small business owner sought to acquire the assets of a mall-based fast food franchise. The client needed experienced legal guidance to navigate a complex, multi-party transaction involving the seller, the franchisor, the mall’s leasing agency, and a lending institution providing bank financing.
Catch the January broadcast of EAC's
By Lavelle Law and EAC January 27, 2026
The January broadcast of Elgin’s "Chamber Chat" with EAC President Carol Gieske, features Lavelle Law Shareholder Steve Migala and KCT Credit Union’s Yvonne Irving.
More Posts