Banking and Business Monthly – March 2024

Steven A. Migala • March 12, 2024

The CFPB’s New Rule Regulating Credit Card Late Fees

A man in a suit and tie is writing in a notebook.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) announced a regulatory amendment on March 5, 2024, targeting credit card late fees, a significant move poised to alter the financial landscape for both consumers and credit card issuers. Under this new rule, the maximum allowable late fee chargeable by large credit card issuers is significantly reduced to $8. This decision follows a proposal released in March 2023 and will take effect 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.


Who Does this Rule Apply to?


The rule differentiates between credit card issuers based on the size of their account holdings, specifically targeting large issuers while providing exemptions for smaller issuers. Entities with one million or more open accounts are the primary subjects of the new regulations. The CFFB estimates this group includes the largest 30 to 35 credit card issuers, which accounts for more than 95% of the credit card market’s total outstanding balances.


In contrast, issuers with fewer than one million open accounts are not subject to the $8 cap. The CFPB has indicated that applying the rule to these smaller entities would impose a disproportionate compliance burden. Smaller card issuers may still charge a higher safe harbor threshold for credit card late fees and automatically increase the safe harbor dollar amount based on the Consumer Price Index.


Key Provisions & Requirements


Reduction of Safe Harbor Late Fees: The rule substantially reduces the safe harbor late fee from the existing amounts of up to $30 for the first violation and $41 for subsequent violations within six billing cycles. The new amount is $8 for late payments, applicable to all subsequent late payment violations occurring within six months of the initial violation.


Requirement for Cost Analysis: For larger card issuers wishing to charge late fees above the $8 threshold, the rule mandates a rigorous cost analysis to demonstrate that such fees are necessary to cover the actual costs incurred from late payments. The rule clarifies that costs related to post-charge-off collections cannot be included in this analysis.


Inflation Adjustment Limitations: The rule modifies the approach to annual inflation adjustments for late fee safe harbor amounts. Unlike previous practices that allowed for automatic annual adjustments based on inflation, the CFPB will now monitor the market and make adjustments to the safe harbor amount as deemed necessary.


Rate and Fee Increases and Management Tools: The rule also acknowledges that issuers can deter late payments and manage associated risks through other means, such as increasing interest rates, raising annual and monthly fees, and adjusting credit lines. However, the rule stipulates that larger card issuers considering adjustments to their APRs must conduct a rate reevaluation under Section 1026.59 of Regulation Z.


Charges Up to Amount of Required Minimum Payment: The rule maintains the provision that allows card issuers to charge late fees up to the full amount of the required minimum payment due, provided such fees comply with the cost-analysis requirements established by Regulation Z.


Exclusion of Courtesy Period: The CFPB considered including a 15-day courtesy period requirement before a late fee could be assessed. However, the final rule did not implement any courtesy period for late fees. The CFPB indicated the potential benefits were outweighed by the burden it could cause regarding customer confusion.


What’s Next for Large Credit Card Issuers?


Policy Assessment and Adjustment: Large credit card issuers should conduct a thorough review of their current late fee policies to ensure alignment with the new rule, including evaluating whether to adopt the $8 safe harbor for late fees or undertake a detailed cost analysis.


Cost Analysis for Higher Fees: For issuers considering fees above the $8 limit, a comprehensive cost analysis becomes imperative. This analysis must demonstrate that the higher fees are necessary to cover the specific costs associated with the late payments, excluding post-charge-off collection costs.


Disclosure and Communication Updates: The new late fee provisions necessitate updates to a range of customer communications and disclosures. This includes changes to account-opening disclosures, periodic statements, and advertising materials to reflect the revised fee structure. Issuers will need to ensure that all relevant disclosures are clear, accurate, and in compliance with the requirements of Regulation Z.


The expertise and guidance of legal professionals can be useful in navigating the complexities of the CFPB's new rule on credit card late fees. For further inquiries or questions, please contact me at smigala@lavellelaw.com or at (847) 705-7555. Thanks go to Nathan Toy for his assistance with this month’s article.


More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

Join our session to learn legal tips for successfully launching or growing a business!
By Lavelle Law April 3, 2026
Launching or growing a business? Don’t get tripped up by the legal stuff that can make or break you. Join us for this free seminar on May 13, 2026, and learn key legal tips for entrepreneurs.
Experienced business attorney Kerry Lavelle breaks down the three main avenues for buying a business
By Kerry M. Lavelle March 24, 2026
Thinking about buying a business? There’s more than one way to do it, and choosing the right path can save you time, money, and headaches. In this video, experienced business attorney Kerry Lavelle breaks down the three main avenues for buying a business, along with the pros and cons of each.
Lessons from the Chance the Rapper Manager Dispute
By Anthony V. Letto March 19, 2026
A lawsuit involving Chance the Rapper and his former manager, Pat Corcoran, highlights a costly lesson for businesses, creatives, and entrepreneurs alike: handshake deals can lead to million-dollar disputes.
Lavelle Saves Client $330K with Strategic Timing and Collaboration
By Tax Group March 18, 2026
Our client was haunted by non-dischargeable federal tax liabilities of over $400K from a business venture. After strategic timing and working with our Bankruptcy team, $330K was written off by the IRS before we filed Chapter 7 for the client, and he suffered no adverse results from the four-month delay.
Join Lavelle Law on April 9, for our Business After Hours!
By Team Lavelle March 13, 2026
Play Ball with Lavelle Law on April 9! Step up to the plate and join our annual Business After Hours event, hosted in the friendly confines of our Schaumburg office. Bonus points: Feel free to rock your favorite baseball team’s gear and show off your fandom while you’re at it! Free event for SBA members!
IRS Announces its Dirty Dozen Tax Scams for 2026
By Timothy M. Hughes March 10, 2026
The IRS announced its annual Dirty Dozen list of tax scams for 2026 that threaten the tax and financial information of taxpayers, businesses, and tax professionals. The Dirty Dozen is part of a broader campaign conducted by the IRS to educate taxpayers about identity theft schemes and other forms of fraud.
New Illinois Employment Laws for 2026
By Lance C. Ziebell and Sarah J. Reusché February 19, 2026
Lavelle Law seminar highlighted key 2026 Illinois employment laws for employers: expanded Workplace Transparency Act rules, AI discrimination bans in hiring, paid nursing breaks, broader state employee insurance, & upcoming neonatal ICU leave.
New guidance on how businesses can take advantage of the return of 100 percent bonus depreciation.
By Frank J. Portera and Anthony V. Letto February 16, 2026
For many businesses, the ability to fully expense capital investments in the first year presents a meaningful opportunity to reduce tax liability and reinvest in growth. Proper classification, timing, and election planning remain essential to maximizing the benefit.
New FinCEN Reporting Rule for Certain Residential Real Estate Transactions
By Steven A. Migala February 10, 2026
Beginning 3.1.26, new federal regulations issued by FinCEN will significantly affect how certain residential real estate closings are handled. Issued under the authority of the Bank Secrecy Act, the rule requires the reporting of specified non-financed residential real estate transfers involving legal entities & trusts
Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge Taxpayer’s Questionable Tax Liabilities
By Timothy M. Hughes February 10, 2026
Certain income taxes can be discharged in bankruptcy if they meet a four-part test, the last test being a subjective test. On January 20, 2026, Judge Bentley of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the SDNY issued a 46-page judgment determining that a chapter 7 debtor did not meet the fourth test.
More Posts