Recent Development in the Biometric Information Privacy Act
Brian J. Massimino • February 19, 2019
Businesses beware! On January 25, 2019, the Illinois Supreme Court
issued a unanimous opinion resolving a contested interpretation of the state’s
Biometric Information Privacy Act. In short, the high Court ruled in Rosenbach
v. Six Flags Entm't Corp
., that to state a claim under the Act, a plaintiff
need not allege actual harm. In this podcast, attorney Brian Massimino explains
why this decision has opened the floodgates for more litigation in this area.
Podcast Link
More News & Resources
Lavelle Law News and Events

On August 5, 2026, the Internal Revenue Service issued Notice 2026-28 providing guidance on the employer credit for paid family and medical leave (“PFML”) under the Working Families Tax Cuts (“WFTC”). The WFTC makes permanent and expands eligibility and coverage for employers offering PFML benefits to employees.

Thinking about using AI to represent yourself in litigation? Think again. It is well-documented that pro se litigants are less likely to prevail compared to their represented counterparts. Regardless, AI has provided people with a false sense of security, tempting them to represent themselves regardless.

High-profile couples like Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce are taking strict steps to protect their privacy. Reports confirm that wedding guests must sign non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) before receiving event details. This highlights how NDAs help individuals and businesses safeguard sensitive information.







