Blog Post

Honey, I Want the House! – Division of the Marital Residence in Illinois Divorce Matters

Victoria R. Paton & Nayeli Cadenas • Jul 22, 2022


In Illinois dissolution (divorce) proceedings, the parties’ property is either “marital” or “non-marital.” Non-marital property is property acquired prior to the marriage or acquired through gift or inheritance. All other property is marital property, regardless of which party acquired it or how it is titled. Typically, one of the biggest marital assets, and therefore one of the biggest points of contention in a dissolution, is the home the parties resided in during the marriage (the “marital residence.”)


With one house and two parties who no longer wish to live together, how do the courts decide who stays and who goes? This answer is not a simple one…but typically, there are three options. 1) Listing the marital residence for sale; 2) a buyout, and 3) awarding the marital residence to one party in dividing the marital estate. These options are explained below.*


LISTING THE MARITAL RESIDENCE FOR SALE:


This option usually occurs by agreement of the parties or by court order when the parties cannot agree on who gets to stay and who has to go, or when the parties cannot afford to maintain the home. The process begins with the mutual (or court-ordered) selection of a Realtor who determines the list price. The parties then equitably divide the costs of listing the home, any necessary repairs, Realtor commissions, and real estate attorney fees. On closing, the parties equitably divide the net proceeds from the sale.  


BUYOUT:


A buyout typically occurs when one party wants to remain in the marital residence and the other does not, or when the parties agree that it is in the best interests of the minor children that one party retain the marital residence. The Court may also order a buyout, as discussed below.

 

A buyout requires an appraisal to determine the value of the marital residence, the cost for which is typically split between the parties. If the marital residence is encumbered by a mortgage on dissolution, the party remaining in the marital residence will then refinance the home to remove the other party’s name from the loan. Following the refinance, the parties will equitably divide the equity in the marital residence (value of the marital residence as determined by the appraisal minus the mortgage balance) between them. Lastly, the party leaving the marital residence will execute a quitclaim deed, completely releasing their rights in the marital residence to the other party.


AWARDING THE MARITAL RESIDENCE TO ONE PARTY:


This last option usually comes about when the parties cannot agree on the options outlined above, or when the court does not find them appropriate. A court can order the buyout of the marital residence, as outlined above. In ordering such, the court will consider several factors - including, but not limited to:


  • Each party’s contribution to the marital residence and/or the marital estate
  • Any dissipation or wasting of marital property by a party
  • The value of the marital estate assigned to each spouse
  • The duration of the marriage
  • The relevant economic circumstances of each party
  • The custodial provisions for any children
  • Maintenance (alimony) awarded to each party
  • The tax consequences of the property division


The court may also award the marital residence to one party without requiring any sort of buyout, in consideration of any of the factors outlined above. This does not necessarily mean that the other party gets “nothing” – it simply means that they do not receive any portion of the home in the division of marital property.


If you are considering initiating dissolution proceedings in Illinois, or are involved in the same and have questions regarding the division of the marital estate, please reach out to the attorneys at Lavelle Law to assist you with your case.

 

Should you have additional questions regarding the subject matter hereinabove, please call us at 847-705-7555 or email Attorney Victoria R. Paton at vpaton@lavellelaw.com to schedule your free and confidential one-hour consultation to discuss your options.



* Please keep in mind that every dissolution matter is different, and the parties’ particular circumstances or agreements can lead to vastly different outcomes than what this article outlines.


More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

Understanding the FTC’s Nationwide Ban on Noncompete Agreements
By Steven A. Migala 03 May, 2024
On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), in a 3-2 vote, issued its final Non-Compete Clause Rule (“Rule”) which prohibits noncompete clauses in agreements between employees and their workers. This highly anticipated Rule follows a substantially similar proposed rule from the FTC released on January 19, 2023. The Rule will not become effective until 120 days after publication in the Federal Register, and covered employers will be required to comply with the Rule by that effective date, which could come as early as August of this year. By the FTC’s estimate, this ban could affect up to one in five American workers.
Divorces that involve small and medium businesses have unique concerns and considerations.
By Joseph A. Olszowka 02 May, 2024
When determining how to distribute the marital assets between parties to a divorce, the division of an interest in a small or medium business owned by one or both of the parties is more complex and requires a careful examination of the value of the business or business interests. The Court must determine the value of the business interest in order to determine how to equitably divide all marital assets in which the parties have an interest. The Court will regularly rely on the valuation reports of the parties' experts regarding the value of the business. The business valuation expert will utilize a number of different methods in determining the value of a business. The professional appraiser will examine and assess the value of the business and provide expert testimony and reports to the parties and the Court.
Vehicle dealerships need to navigate the complex terrain of adhering to BIPA to avoid lawsuits.
By Sarah J. Reusché and Nathan Toy 30 Apr, 2024
Vehicle dealerships particularly have recently found themselves needing to navigate the complex terrain of adhering to the BIPA’s stringent requirements to avoid being targeted through lawsuits. There has been a recent noticeable uptick in class action lawsuits under the BIPA, serving as a critical wake-up call for the automotive retail industry, highlighting the need for dealerships to review and enhance their practices if they are using biometric technology.
Learn the complexities of Illinois commercial leases and avoid common pitfalls.
By Lavelle Law 29 Apr, 2024
Join us for this seminar as Lavelle Law attorneys Kelly Anderson and Chance Badertscher will unpack the complexities of Illinois commercial leases in order to prepare you for strong leasing relationships.
An essential part of a good contract is often overlooked. Learn about fee shifting provisions.
By Joseph O. Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek 23 Apr, 2024
Between the state of Illinois and federal courts, there are well over 200 statutes that deal with fee shifting provisions. They lay out ways in which legal fees may become the responsibility of one party in a lawsuit. In this video, Lavelle Law Associates Jodie Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek discuss ways that these provisions should be included in contracts and how they can be used advantageously.
Great advice on what to expect on your final walkthrough.
By Chance W. Badertscher 22 Apr, 2024
Lavelle Law real estate attorney, Chance Badertscher, recently participated in a Straight Up Chicago Investor Podcast and shared his expertise on what to expect on the final walkthrough before your real estate closing. He breaks it down and shares tips for both the buyer and the seller.
An essential part of a good contract is often overlooked. Learn about fee shifting provisions.
By Joseph O. Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek 18 Apr, 2024
Between the state of Illinois and federal courts, there are well over 200 statutes which deal with fee shifting provisions. They lay out ways in which legal fees may become the responsibility of one party in a lawsuit. Lavelle Law Associates Jodie Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek discuss ways that these provisions should be included in contracts and how they can be used advantageously.
Emergency Estate Tax Savings - a Lavelle Law Success Story
By Estate Planning and Administration 16 Apr, 2024
Our team worked very quickly (in a matter of just a few days) to establish temporary guardianship of the client, and – most importantly – successfully argued for the judge to authorize the guardian to execute and finalize the estate plan documents on the client’s behalf. Finalizing the estate planning documents in advance of the client’s death saved the estate and the client’s family nearly $500,000 in estate taxes.
Watch this video if you are considering setting up a medical spa in Illinois.
By Eso H. Akunne 12 Apr, 2024
Businesses classified as medical spas have a variety of special considerations that must be adhered to in the state of Illinois. In this video, Lavelle Law attorney Eso Akunne discusses critical issues that must be met to operate with state laws. If you are interested in getting involved in this rapidly growing industry be sure to watch this video.
Time to Claim a Refund Expires on May 17, 2024 Deadline, Then $1 Billion in Refunds Will be Lost.
By Timothy M. Hughes 10 Apr, 2024
The IRS recently announced that almost 940,000 people across the nation have unclaimed refunds for tax year 2020 but face a May 17 deadline to submit their tax returns. The IRS estimates more than $1 billion in refunds remain unclaimed because people have not filed their 2020 tax returns yet. The average median refund is $932 for 2020. The IRS estimates that about 36,200 Illinois taxpayers may lose $40,608,000 in potential refunds.
More Posts
Share by: