Honey, I Want the House! – Division of the Marital Residence in Illinois Divorce Matters

Victoria R. Paton & Nayeli Cadenas • July 22, 2022
A man is sitting on a couch while a woman stands in front of a window.


In Illinois dissolution (divorce) proceedings, the parties’ property is either “marital” or “non-marital.” Non-marital property is property acquired prior to the marriage or acquired through gift or inheritance. All other property is marital property, regardless of which party acquired it or how it is titled. Typically, one of the biggest marital assets, and therefore one of the biggest points of contention in a dissolution, is the home the parties resided in during the marriage (the “marital residence.”)


With one house and two parties who no longer wish to live together, how do the courts decide who stays and who goes? This answer is not a simple one…but typically, there are three options. 1) Listing the marital residence for sale; 2) a buyout, and 3) awarding the marital residence to one party in dividing the marital estate. These options are explained below.*


LISTING THE MARITAL RESIDENCE FOR SALE:


This option usually occurs by agreement of the parties or by court order when the parties cannot agree on who gets to stay and who has to go, or when the parties cannot afford to maintain the home. The process begins with the mutual (or court-ordered) selection of a Realtor who determines the list price. The parties then equitably divide the costs of listing the home, any necessary repairs, Realtor commissions, and real estate attorney fees. On closing, the parties equitably divide the net proceeds from the sale.  


BUYOUT:


A buyout typically occurs when one party wants to remain in the marital residence and the other does not, or when the parties agree that it is in the best interests of the minor children that one party retain the marital residence. The Court may also order a buyout, as discussed below.

 

A buyout requires an appraisal to determine the value of the marital residence, the cost for which is typically split between the parties. If the marital residence is encumbered by a mortgage on dissolution, the party remaining in the marital residence will then refinance the home to remove the other party’s name from the loan. Following the refinance, the parties will equitably divide the equity in the marital residence (value of the marital residence as determined by the appraisal minus the mortgage balance) between them. Lastly, the party leaving the marital residence will execute a quitclaim deed, completely releasing their rights in the marital residence to the other party.


AWARDING THE MARITAL RESIDENCE TO ONE PARTY:


This last option usually comes about when the parties cannot agree on the options outlined above, or when the court does not find them appropriate. A court can order the buyout of the marital residence, as outlined above. In ordering such, the court will consider several factors - including, but not limited to:


  • Each party’s contribution to the marital residence and/or the marital estate
  • Any dissipation or wasting of marital property by a party
  • The value of the marital estate assigned to each spouse
  • The duration of the marriage
  • The relevant economic circumstances of each party
  • The custodial provisions for any children
  • Maintenance (alimony) awarded to each party
  • The tax consequences of the property division


The court may also award the marital residence to one party without requiring any sort of buyout, in consideration of any of the factors outlined above. This does not necessarily mean that the other party gets “nothing” – it simply means that they do not receive any portion of the home in the division of marital property.


If you are considering initiating dissolution proceedings in Illinois, or are involved in the same and have questions regarding the division of the marital estate, please reach out to the attorneys at Lavelle Law to assist you with your case.

 

Should you have additional questions regarding the subject matter hereinabove, please call us at 847-705-7555 or email Attorney Victoria R. Paton at vpaton@lavellelaw.com to schedule your free and confidential one-hour consultation to discuss your options.



* Please keep in mind that every dissolution matter is different, and the parties’ particular circumstances or agreements can lead to vastly different outcomes than what this article outlines.


More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

The Junk Fee Ban Act and pricing transparency legislation.
By Sarah J. Reusché and Jacob Rotolo April 23, 2025
If enacted, the Junk Fee Ban Act would protect consumers from hidden fees and promote fair business practices in Illinois. While there has yet to be legislation in the proposed Junk Fee Ban Act that excludes dealerships, it will be important to look for future updates on this bill, as Illinois is quickly becoming a hub for vehicle innovation and automotive plant expansion.
Ancillary probate is required when a person dies owning real estate outside of their home state.
By Heather A. McCollum April 21, 2025
When someone passes away owning property in another state, their estate may need to go through ancillary probate—a secondary court process in that state.
$9.9 Million Dollar Purchase of Packaged Multi-Unit Properties
By Commercial Real Estate April 18, 2025
Lavelle Law represented a joint venture in its $9.9 million acquisition of four multi-unit buildings.
Type F Reorg offers a means of achieving structural change while preserving tax continuity
By Steven A. Migala and Nathan P. Toy April 14, 2025
A Type F reorganization (“F Reorg”), governed by Section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Internal Revenue Code, provides a strategically significant mechanism for corporate restructuring. Defined as a “mere change in identity, form, or place of organization of one corporation,” an F Reorg permits a corporation to alter its legal existence while being treated for federal tax purposes as the same entity. This recharacterization allows for the uninterrupted preservation of tax attributes while maintaining shareholder continuity.
Estate Planning for Your Pet: Securing Your Pet’s Future with a Pet Trust
By Jackie R. Luthringshausen April 10, 2025
When it comes to estate planning, most people think about providing for their loved ones—but what about the furry, feathered, or scaled members of your family? In the United States, 68% of households own at least one pet, according to the American Pet Products Association’s 2023-2024 National Pet Owners Survey. For many, pets are more than just companions—they’re family. Ensuring their care after your death or incapacity is a vital part of comprehensive estate planning. In Illinois, a Pet Trust offers a powerful solution to guarantee your pet’s well-being long after you’re gone.
IRS Press Release Addresses Payment Plan Options
By Timothy M. Hughes April 10, 2025
IRS Press Release Addresses Payment Plan Options - A recent press release by the IRS addressed the options that are available to taxpayers who may owe more on April 15th than they can pay. The IRS advised taxpayers that they do not need to wait until April 15 to file their 2024 federal return, and if they owe and are unable to pay the balance in full, there are payment plans available to help them pay their tax obligation.
Learn about essential legal protections to strengthen your business and safeguard your interests.
By Lavelle Law April 9, 2025
Join us on May 21 in Schaumburg for an engaging Breakfast Briefs seminar, delving into vital strategies to fortify your business. This session will explore the critical role of crafting ironclad non-compete agreements, shielding your trade secrets, and mastering the nuances of temporary restraining orders (TROs) and injunctive relief. Our presenters, attorneys Matthew Sheahin and Jennifer Tee, bring a wealth of experience in this legal domain. Seize this chance to bolster your company’s legal protections and lay a solid groundwork for enduring success!
FinCEN Eliminates BOI Reporting Obligations!
By Frank P. Portera March 25, 2025
On March 21, 2025, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued its interim final rule stating that those entities previously classified as "domestic reporting companies" are now exempt from all BOI reporting requirements. On the other hand, all foreign entities registered to do business in the USA must file their own initial BOI reports within 30 days of the initial final rule's publication, if they have not done so already.
Join us April 3, 2025 for Business After Hours 5-7 PM
By Lavelle Law March 19, 2025
Spring is here, and with baseball season kicking off, we’re stepping up to the plate with our annual Lavelle Law Business After Hours event. We’re excited to partner with our friends in the Schaumburg business community for an evening of networking, good vibes, and a few surprises—all hosted in the friendly confines of our Schaumburg office. Bonus points: Feel free to rock your favorite baseball team’s gear and show off your fandom while you’re at it!
Delaware Court  Provides the Standard of Supreme Review for the Redomestication of Corporations
By Steven A. Migala and Anthony Letto March 12, 2025
Delaware corporations seeking to redomesticate to another state should be advised that on February 4, 2025, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Palkon v. Maffei, C.A. No. 2023-0449-JTL, addressing a challenge to TripAdvisor's redomestication from a Delaware corporation to a Nevada corporation. The case raised important questions regarding the standard of review applicable to such reincorporations, particularly when fiduciaries may derive a benefit from shifting to a legal regime perceived as more friendly.
More Posts