What is the Business Reason for Concentrating Your Practice in a Specific Area?

Kerry M. Lavelle • October 19, 2017

The question as to whether you should be a generalist or a specialist has been bantered about for years in the practice of law. There have been many seminars and books commenting on the subject, leading to the overwhelming conclusion that we as attorneys, need to concentrate our practice in one or two narrow areas of law and become really good, efficient practitioners in those areas of the law.

Generalist

Contrarians will argue that as a small or solo practicing lawyer, you need to generate revenue in any way that it comes and sometimes picking up wills and trusts drafting, real estate closings, lease disputes in court, and a divorce case are all the natural opportunities for you to earn income. That may be a true economic necessity for the new or small practitioner to put food on the table, but in the long run it is not sustainable for a successful practice and career in the law.

Any experienced practitioner will tell you that it is his or her deep understanding of a few (often times related) areas of law that made him or her successful in the practice of law. Remember the “jack of all trades is a master of none.” We need to be great at something and being great in one or two areas of the law is hard enough – it is difficult to be great in multiple areas of the law.

A Focused Practice

More than just expertise, let’s look at the business case for concentrating one’s practice. By concentrating your practice to one area of law, you can network with other attorneys trying to gain their confidence in referring clients much more easily than if you practice in a great breadth of areas. Networking among other lawyers is eminently easier when you do not appear to be competing with those same lawyers. For example, if divorce work is your strength, you will be able to obtain referrals from every attorney in your network that does not do any divorce work. And even if they do divorce work, you will be able to get some conflict work from them if they trust your skill set.

Remember, once you establish your concentration in the practice of law, you absolutely need to become great at it; you can then expect referrals from attorneys primarily because you are the best attorney they know at providing legal services in that area of the law, and secondarily, because they do not do it and cannot best service the client’s needs. In turn, if they are real estate or bankruptcy attorneys, you can refer those cases to them, building a network of trust that supports both of your offices. Networking among our peers in the bar, works best when your selling proposition to the market is that you are high-level attorney providing exceptional services in one or two narrow areas of the law. Furthermore, an attorney with a focused practice is able to more easily make referrals to other attorneys (for matters outside of the respective practice area).

Take a look at the model of personal injury lawyers. Their practice is sustained by referrals, and in fact pay referral fees in a way that are governed under the code of professional responsibility in their jurisdictions. Personal injury lawyers understand that they can network with estate planning, business transaction, divorce, criminal, traffic lawyers and all the rest of the practitioners out there that do not do personal injury work. When they do network, they want to become the personal injury lawyer connection with your particular network. Personal injury lawyers are excellent at networking among other lawyers that do not provide their services, that need and want to put their clients with the best possible representation.

For any further discussion on concentrating your practice and how to expand your law practice from one narrow concentration to other related areas of the law, contact Kerry Lavelle at klavelle@lavellelaw.com for coaching and assistance on growing your practice.


Kerry Lavelle is the author of "The Business Guide to Law: Creating and Operating a Successful Law Firm" published by the American Bar Association. It can be found on the ABA website at: http://bit.ly/1J1p0Aa. He grew his solo practice to a 26-attorney firm, accumulating numerous awards and commendations along the way for his legal work and community service. He is a frequent speaker at bar association seminars and conferences on law office management, and has served as an adjunct professor for business, economics and law school classes, and has served on boards for the Northwest Suburban, Illinois and American Bar Association.

CLICK HERE to listen to our podcast for some great insights on running your law office!

More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

Judge Says “You’re Out!” to Stalker Ex  - a Lavelle Law Success Story
By Family Law Practice Group July 28, 2026
A client came to us needing protection from an ex-boyfriend who wouldn’t take no for an answer. She broke up with him after he used her indoor pet camera to spy on her without her permission, then surveilled her at her home and chased her through a parking lot.
Type F Reorganization
By Frank J. Portera July 28, 2026
Thinking about selling your business? In this video, Lavelle Law attorney Frank Portera explains how a Type F Reorganization can create tax efficiencies and simplify the sale process by reducing the need for third-party consents.
6 reasons why you shouldn’t rely on AI for legal advice.
By Sarah J. Reusché and Shelley McCarthy July 17, 2026
Thinking about using AI to represent yourself in litigation? Think again. It is well-documented that pro se litigants are less likely to prevail compared to their represented counterparts. Regardless, AI has provided people with a false sense of security, tempting them to represent themselves regardless.
Representation and Warranties Insurance Democratization: A Game Changer for Many Deals
By Steven A. Migala July 13, 2026
Representations and warranties insurance (“RWI”) for mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) is more accessible than ever due to increasing democratization in the market. Now, RWI can be a viable option for smaller, mid-market deals.
IRS Announces Simplified Penalty Relief
By Timothy M. Hughes July 10, 2026
On July 8, 2026, the Internal Revenue Service announced a new automatic process to provide penalty relief for taxpayers with a history of filing and paying on time, reducing the need for those taxpayers to request assistance in addressing penalty relief.
NDAs in the Spotlight: What Swift and Kelce’s Wedding Reveals About Protecting Your Privacy.
By Theodore M. McGinn June 30, 2026
High-profile couples like Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce are taking strict steps to protect their privacy. Reports confirm that wedding guests must sign non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) before receiving event details. This highlights how NDAs help individuals and businesses safeguard sensitive information.
Gross Lease vs. Net Lease: Which is Better for Your Business?
By Theodore M. McGinn June 29, 2026
For many businesses, the commercial lease is the largest single expense each year. But are you actually getting the best deal, or are you unknowingly paying for hidden costs? In this Lavelle Law Minute, Attorney Ted McGinn breaks down the two most common commercial leases: Gross Leases and Net Leases.
Cubs Legend Ryne Sandberg’s Family Heads to Court Over Mishandling of Trust
By Brian I. Warens June 25, 2026
Cubs Hall of Famer Ryne Sandberg, affectionately known as “Ryno,” is forever remembered for his legendary “Sandberg Game.” Sadly, his death last July has since triggered a bitter family dispute, with his children now suing his widow, Margaret Sandberg, over alleged violations of his trust.
Success Story - $7.5 Million Ukrainian Village Commercial Land Sale
By Commercial Real Estate June 23, 2026
This transaction highlights Lavelle Law’s deep expertise in managing complex commercial real estate deals in Chicago’s dynamic market, delivering efficient, client-focused outcomes even under accelerated timelines.
SCOTUS Rules SEC Can Seek Disgorgement Without Proving Victim Financial Loss
By Steven A. Migala June 22, 2026
The U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling on June 4, 2026, in Sripetch v. Sec. & Exch. Comm’n, clarifying a significant question in securities enforcement. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) does not need to identify victims who suffered actual financial harm to pursue disgorgement of ill-gotten gains.
More Posts