Trademark Rights and Common Misunderstandings

Theodore M. McGinn • June 29, 2021
A close up of a tm logo on a metal surface.


While speaking with several clients filing trademark applications, there are common misconceptions about trademark rights that small business owners hold. The two most frequent misunderstandings are the belief that you do not have rights to your mark unless you file for a trademark and that filing for a trademark gives you an exclusive right to the mark. Both of these are somewhat true but include important misunderstandings that small business owners need to understand.


Myth #1:  My mark has no protection unless I file for a federal or state trademark. This is not true. The most basic way to gain the exclusive right to your mark is to use it in commerce (signs, labels on products, etc.) first in your industry and limited to the geographic area of your use. Just the act of using the mark gives your business a “common law” right to use that mark exclusively. Note that you must be the first to use it, and your exclusive is only within your industry. For example, you could open an auto body shop called “McDonalds” right next to a fast-food restaurant by the same name and still have that name protected as a common law trademark. Why? Because you were the first to use it in your industry. In trademark law, we refer to this test as a “likelihood of confusion.” Even though your name is identical to the fast-food restaurant next door, there is no likelihood that consumers would think you are operating as a fast-food burger restaurant.


Myth #2:  Filing for a state or federal trademark guarantees protection of my mark. This is also not true. Registering a trademark creates a presumption that you are the exclusive owner of the mark. But if another business can prove that they were using the mark first (and that there is a likelihood of confusion), you could be barred from using the mark. However, as noted in more detail below, the original user would have the duty to prove that their rights are senior to yours. The court will assume you are the exclusive owner unless someone else can prove otherwise. But it is important to note that someone might do just that.


So on the one hand you can obtain trademark rights without filing a trademark application. And on the other hand, you do not have a guarantee of rights if you do file. So why on earth do businesses spend the money to register trademarks? Trademarks are a great way to market your goods or services. They indicate to consumers the source of the goods or services. If your business is better than your competitors, and consumers know that, then a trademark will make you stand out.


In addition, as noted above, the filing creates the presumption that you are the exclusive owner. If anyone else is using the mark, you can issue a cease and desist letter or file suit and it is up to them to prove they have rights superior to yours. This is an important advantage because having the burden of proof in a legal matter can be expensive. The registration certificate proves ownership and eliminates the need for extensive evidence, leaving the opponent to bear the cost and burden of building and presenting their case. 


Moreover, registering a trademark is a good deterrent to prevent another party from using your mark. Searching the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s website for a registered trademark is easy, free, and fairly quick. Before beginning to use a mark, it is common for small businesses to search this database to see if there is a chance that they will be infringing upon someone else’s mark. As noted above, you’ll have rights to your mark and might even win if someone infringes on those rights even if you do not obtain registration of your trademark. But registering your mark might prevent that legal battle in the first place. Lastly, should you be forced to litigate to defend your rights, registration will enable you to recover your attorney fees in such a lawsuit. Such right creates leverages and puts you in a better legal position.



Trademark filings can be challenging and there are several pitfalls to be avoided. If you have a particular name, phrase, or image that you would like to protect from infringement, contact me at 847-705-7555 or tmcginn@lavellelaw.com to discuss the process and resources needed to protect your company’s marks by filing for a state or federal trademark.

More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

The Junk Fee Ban Act and pricing transparency legislation.
By Sarah J. Reusché and Jacob Rotolo April 23, 2025
If enacted, the Junk Fee Ban Act would protect consumers from hidden fees and promote fair business practices in Illinois. While there has yet to be legislation in the proposed Junk Fee Ban Act that excludes dealerships, it will be important to look for future updates on this bill, as Illinois is quickly becoming a hub for vehicle innovation and automotive plant expansion.
Ancillary probate is required when a person dies owning real estate outside of their home state.
By Heather A. McCollum April 21, 2025
When someone passes away owning property in another state, their estate may need to go through ancillary probate—a secondary court process in that state.
$9.9 Million Dollar Purchase of Packaged Multi-Unit Properties
By Commercial Real Estate April 18, 2025
Lavelle Law represented a joint venture in its $9.9 million acquisition of four multi-unit buildings.
Type F Reorg offers a means of achieving structural change while preserving tax continuity
By Steven A. Migala and Nathan P. Toy April 14, 2025
A Type F reorganization (“F Reorg”), governed by Section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Internal Revenue Code, provides a strategically significant mechanism for corporate restructuring. Defined as a “mere change in identity, form, or place of organization of one corporation,” an F Reorg permits a corporation to alter its legal existence while being treated for federal tax purposes as the same entity. This recharacterization allows for the uninterrupted preservation of tax attributes while maintaining shareholder continuity.
Estate Planning for Your Pet: Securing Your Pet’s Future with a Pet Trust
By Jackie R. Luthringshausen April 10, 2025
When it comes to estate planning, most people think about providing for their loved ones—but what about the furry, feathered, or scaled members of your family? In the United States, 68% of households own at least one pet, according to the American Pet Products Association’s 2023-2024 National Pet Owners Survey. For many, pets are more than just companions—they’re family. Ensuring their care after your death or incapacity is a vital part of comprehensive estate planning. In Illinois, a Pet Trust offers a powerful solution to guarantee your pet’s well-being long after you’re gone.
IRS Press Release Addresses Payment Plan Options
By Timothy M. Hughes April 10, 2025
IRS Press Release Addresses Payment Plan Options - A recent press release by the IRS addressed the options that are available to taxpayers who may owe more on April 15th than they can pay. The IRS advised taxpayers that they do not need to wait until April 15 to file their 2024 federal return, and if they owe and are unable to pay the balance in full, there are payment plans available to help them pay their tax obligation.
Learn about essential legal protections to strengthen your business and safeguard your interests.
By Lavelle Law April 9, 2025
Join us on May 21 in Schaumburg for an engaging Breakfast Briefs seminar, delving into vital strategies to fortify your business. This session will explore the critical role of crafting ironclad non-compete agreements, shielding your trade secrets, and mastering the nuances of temporary restraining orders (TROs) and injunctive relief. Our presenters, attorneys Matthew Sheahin and Jennifer Tee, bring a wealth of experience in this legal domain. Seize this chance to bolster your company’s legal protections and lay a solid groundwork for enduring success!
FinCEN Eliminates BOI Reporting Obligations!
By Frank P. Portera March 25, 2025
On March 21, 2025, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued its interim final rule stating that those entities previously classified as "domestic reporting companies" are now exempt from all BOI reporting requirements. On the other hand, all foreign entities registered to do business in the USA must file their own initial BOI reports within 30 days of the initial final rule's publication, if they have not done so already.
Join us April 3, 2025 for Business After Hours 5-7 PM
By Lavelle Law March 19, 2025
Spring is here, and with baseball season kicking off, we’re stepping up to the plate with our annual Lavelle Law Business After Hours event. We’re excited to partner with our friends in the Schaumburg business community for an evening of networking, good vibes, and a few surprises—all hosted in the friendly confines of our Schaumburg office. Bonus points: Feel free to rock your favorite baseball team’s gear and show off your fandom while you’re at it!
Delaware Court  Provides the Standard of Supreme Review for the Redomestication of Corporations
By Steven A. Migala and Anthony Letto March 12, 2025
Delaware corporations seeking to redomesticate to another state should be advised that on February 4, 2025, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Palkon v. Maffei, C.A. No. 2023-0449-JTL, addressing a challenge to TripAdvisor's redomestication from a Delaware corporation to a Nevada corporation. The case raised important questions regarding the standard of review applicable to such reincorporations, particularly when fiduciaries may derive a benefit from shifting to a legal regime perceived as more friendly.
More Posts