The Role of Mediation in Family Law Cases

Colleen M. Breems • December 7, 2021
A woman is sitting in a chair talking to another woman.


 “Can’t we just mediate this?” For those going through a family law matter in Illinois, this may be a question that sounds familiar. Indeed, for family law cases that involve children, mediation is often required by the Court prior to proceeding to litigation on co-parenting issues. For cases involving financial issues, the option of mediation may also be an attractive topic of discussion to avoid a lengthy and expensive litigation process. What is a mediator, what does the mediation process look like, and is it a good fit for your case?


A mediator is a trained, neutral third party who is either appointed by the Court or hired by the parties. The mediator can assist both sides of a law case and come to an agreement regarding outstanding issues, if possible, in an effort to avoid or reduce litigation on those issues. In family law, these issues can involve co-parenting issues and financial issues. A mediator can meet with the parties, or the parties together with their attorneys, if desired.


The mediation process can be initiated by an agreement at any stage during a family law case, or it can be required by the Court where there are outstanding co-parenting issues. During the mediation process, the mediator assists the parties to define the outstanding issues to be mediated, to facilitate communication regarding those issues, to help the parties brainstorm potential solutions to the those issues, and ideally, to help the parties come to agreements on those issues. Mediation can result in full agreement on the outstanding issues, partial agreement on the issues, or no agreement on the issues. Any agreement reached in mediation must be voluntary by the parties and is reduced to a memorandum of understanding that is carefully drafted by the mediator, reviewed by the parties, and signed by the parties. Communications during mediation are kept confidential and out-of-Court. Mediators only report to the Court as to whether mediation took place, whether a full or partial agreement was reached, and who attended mediation. The agreements reached in mediation can then be entered as a binding Court Order.

 

The mediation process works best when both parties are willing to engage with and are open to the process. It allows parties to avoid the time and expense of litigation, which is often attractive to those involved in family law cases. It often allows both parties to feel heard by each other. It also allows parties to come together to brainstorm and select creative solutions to issues which they believe best fit the needs of their family, as opposed to allowing a Judge to make decisions for them. Mediation agreements between parties also generally have a higher likelihood of being followed and honored by the parties, as opposed to Court Orders which the parties have less control over.


If you would like more information on this topic, please contact the author, trained mediator and family law attorney Colleen M. Breems, at 312-888-4112 or cbreems@lavellelaw.com.

More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

The Junk Fee Ban Act and pricing transparency legislation.
By Sarah J. Reusché and Jacob Rotolo April 23, 2025
If enacted, the Junk Fee Ban Act would protect consumers from hidden fees and promote fair business practices in Illinois. While there has yet to be legislation in the proposed Junk Fee Ban Act that excludes dealerships, it will be important to look for future updates on this bill, as Illinois is quickly becoming a hub for vehicle innovation and automotive plant expansion.
Ancillary probate is required when a person dies owning real estate outside of their home state.
By Heather A. McCollum April 21, 2025
When someone passes away owning property in another state, their estate may need to go through ancillary probate—a secondary court process in that state.
$9.9 Million Dollar Purchase of Packaged Multi-Unit Properties
By Commercial Real Estate April 18, 2025
Lavelle Law represented a joint venture in its $9.9 million acquisition of four multi-unit buildings.
Type F Reorg offers a means of achieving structural change while preserving tax continuity
By Steven A. Migala and Nathan P. Toy April 14, 2025
A Type F reorganization (“F Reorg”), governed by Section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Internal Revenue Code, provides a strategically significant mechanism for corporate restructuring. Defined as a “mere change in identity, form, or place of organization of one corporation,” an F Reorg permits a corporation to alter its legal existence while being treated for federal tax purposes as the same entity. This recharacterization allows for the uninterrupted preservation of tax attributes while maintaining shareholder continuity.
Estate Planning for Your Pet: Securing Your Pet’s Future with a Pet Trust
By Jackie R. Luthringshausen April 10, 2025
When it comes to estate planning, most people think about providing for their loved ones—but what about the furry, feathered, or scaled members of your family? In the United States, 68% of households own at least one pet, according to the American Pet Products Association’s 2023-2024 National Pet Owners Survey. For many, pets are more than just companions—they’re family. Ensuring their care after your death or incapacity is a vital part of comprehensive estate planning. In Illinois, a Pet Trust offers a powerful solution to guarantee your pet’s well-being long after you’re gone.
IRS Press Release Addresses Payment Plan Options
By Timothy M. Hughes April 10, 2025
IRS Press Release Addresses Payment Plan Options - A recent press release by the IRS addressed the options that are available to taxpayers who may owe more on April 15th than they can pay. The IRS advised taxpayers that they do not need to wait until April 15 to file their 2024 federal return, and if they owe and are unable to pay the balance in full, there are payment plans available to help them pay their tax obligation.
Learn about essential legal protections to strengthen your business and safeguard your interests.
By Lavelle Law April 9, 2025
Join us on May 21 in Schaumburg for an engaging Breakfast Briefs seminar, delving into vital strategies to fortify your business. This session will explore the critical role of crafting ironclad non-compete agreements, shielding your trade secrets, and mastering the nuances of temporary restraining orders (TROs) and injunctive relief. Our presenters, attorneys Matthew Sheahin and Jennifer Tee, bring a wealth of experience in this legal domain. Seize this chance to bolster your company’s legal protections and lay a solid groundwork for enduring success!
FinCEN Eliminates BOI Reporting Obligations!
By Frank P. Portera March 25, 2025
On March 21, 2025, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued its interim final rule stating that those entities previously classified as "domestic reporting companies" are now exempt from all BOI reporting requirements. On the other hand, all foreign entities registered to do business in the USA must file their own initial BOI reports within 30 days of the initial final rule's publication, if they have not done so already.
Join us April 3, 2025 for Business After Hours 5-7 PM
By Lavelle Law March 19, 2025
Spring is here, and with baseball season kicking off, we’re stepping up to the plate with our annual Lavelle Law Business After Hours event. We’re excited to partner with our friends in the Schaumburg business community for an evening of networking, good vibes, and a few surprises—all hosted in the friendly confines of our Schaumburg office. Bonus points: Feel free to rock your favorite baseball team’s gear and show off your fandom while you’re at it!
Delaware Court  Provides the Standard of Supreme Review for the Redomestication of Corporations
By Steven A. Migala and Anthony Letto March 12, 2025
Delaware corporations seeking to redomesticate to another state should be advised that on February 4, 2025, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Palkon v. Maffei, C.A. No. 2023-0449-JTL, addressing a challenge to TripAdvisor's redomestication from a Delaware corporation to a Nevada corporation. The case raised important questions regarding the standard of review applicable to such reincorporations, particularly when fiduciaries may derive a benefit from shifting to a legal regime perceived as more friendly.
More Posts