Recorded Statement? – No Thank You!
Nicholas S. Dollenmaier • June 3, 2020
A lot of times after a person has been involved in a car crash, the at fault party’s insurance company gives them a call, sometimes hours after the collision, and asks for a recorded statement. Hardly ever is giving a recorded statement beneficial for the injured person and more often than not it can hurt his/her chances at recovery.
Unfortunately, most people do not see the harm in providing a recorded statement. Most believe that they were not at fault for the accident, were hurt from the accident, and the insurance company will make them “whole” after the accident if they agree to provide the recorded statement. Regrettably, this is not the case and instead of using that recorded statement to make the injured party whole, the insurance company uses it to discredit and sometimes take out of context a person’s words. This is especially true when the insurance company calls hours after the collision. When there is such proximity from the accident to the call, a person cannot be sure that they fully understand the extent of his/her injuries and should not be giving a detailed depiction of the collision itself. There is a good chance that hours after an accident, a person has not had the chance to fully digest the collision, what happened, may be experiencing the symptoms of shock, and are not able to fully realize their situation or their injuries.
This is why we always advise people who are on the fence about retaining a personal injury attorney to not provide a recorded statement until they make their decision. After we are retained, we are able to exert some control over the questions asked, format the conversation, and are able to take independent notes of what was said. Without us being there, the insurance company is able to retain the recording and independently assess how the conversation went. Absent filing a lawsuit, the insurance company is under no obligation to produce the recorded statement to the injured party.
Unfortunately, the insurance company is aware that having an attorney on the line can be beneficial to a person’s case, which is why the call to obtain the recorded statement can come hours after the accident. If you are in this situation, politely refuse to give the recorded statement and make the decision whether you are going to hire a personal injury attorney early. We are here to help. Not only by guiding you through the recorded statement process, if we determine it beneficial to provide, but also ensuring you the most recovery for your case. There are many mistakes that can be made early on in a personal injury situation that can limit your recovery and with our experience; we can help you avoid those.
In short, if you were involved in an accident and the insurance company asks for a recorded statement, politely say no thank you and think about whether you want to hire an attorney before returning the call.
If you have been injured in an automobile accident or as a result of someone’s negligence, please contact attorney Nicholas Dollenmaier at 847-705-7555 or via email at ndollenmaier@lavellelaw.com
to discuss your case and help get the compensation you deserve.
More News & Resources
Lavelle Law News and Events
Taylor Swift’s engagement to Travis Kelce has made a big splash in the news. In this podcast, Lavelle Law family law attorneys Joe Olszowka and Kristina Buchthal Alkass discuss the importance of prenuptial agreements - and not just for the wealthy.
The U.S. Treasury Department issued a preliminary list of nearly 70 jobs that qualify for “no tax on tips.” The occupations include a wide range of services spanning from Rickshaw drivers to digital content creators.
On August 20, 2025, the First District of the Illinois Appellate Court decided Chicago Title Land Trust Co. v. Watkin, 2025 IL App (1st) 241354 (August 20, 2025). At issue in Watkin was whether the expiration of the statute of limitations barring enforcement of a mortgage also extinguishes the mortgage lien.
The Illinois General Assembly has updated the Probate Act of 1975 to improve the small estate affidavit process for settling estates without formal probate. Effective immediately, this amendment offers significant benefits for Illinois residents managing a loved one's estate.
A common consideration in a divorce case is who will get to keep the family pet. Illinois has a specific law that addresses this issue. In this video, divorce attorney Joe Olszowka explains the various factors the court considers when there is a pet involved in an Illinois family law case.
Lavelle Saves Homeowner from Real Estate Tax Bill Disaster - In the end, our client clawed back ownership of his family’s home and was made whole on the attorney fees he was forced to pay to rectify this unfortunate situation.
Recently, OEMs like Tesla and Rivian implemented a direct-to-consumer approach that many state motor vehicle dealer laws are intended to prohibit. On May 27, 2025, the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) submitted a Public Comment, defending state franchise laws.
Join Lavelle Law for an informative presentation tailored to individuals seeking expert guidance on critical family law matters. Our experienced family law attorneys will break down three key areas — prenuptial/postnuptial agreements, collaborative divorce, and child custody.
On August 7, 2025, the IRS announced that, as part of its phased implementation of the July 4th One Big Beautiful Bill Act, there will be no changes to certain information returns or withholding tables for tax year 2025 related to the new law. The IRS outlined key relevant changes to tax filers effective for '25 - '28.
Due to Lavelle’s extensive knowledge in estate and gift tax, we were able to generate a combined federal and Illinois estate tax savings of $1 million for the client.
