Protecting Your Dealership: Defending Against Consumer Actions

Sarah J. Reusche • October 11, 2024


In Illinois, consumer actions against new and used vehicle dealerships are often brought under the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (the “Act”) codified as 815 ILCS 505. Section 10a of the Act allows individuals to file a lawsuit if they suffer actual damages from unfair or deceptive acts or practices from a new or used vehicle dealership. Section 2 of the Act details the prohibitions against “unfair or deceptive acts or practices.” Many of these actions include but are not limited to:

 

Misrepresentation: Providing false or misleading information about a vehicle’s condition, history, or features.


Omission of Material Facts: Failing to disclose important information that could affect a consumer’s decision to purchase a vehicle.


Deceptive Advertising: Engaging in false advertising or using bait-and-switch tactics to lure customers.


Unfair Practices: Conduct considered unethical, oppressive, or causes substantial injury to consumers.

 

If the court favors the consumer, they can be entitled to actual damages, injunctive relief, and attorney's fees and costs. These costs can add up quickly and cause significant financial strain to both family-owned and national dealerships, underscoring the importance of a robust defense strategy.

 


Defenses for Dealerships in Response to Consumer Actions

 

Illinois dealerships have numerous options in defense to a consumer action alleging unfair or deceptive acts.

 

Lack of Causation Defense: Dealers can argue the alleged deceptive act did not cause the consumer’s damages. This defense is based on the Act’s general requirement that the consumer must suffer "actual damage" because of the alleged unfair or deceptive act.

 

Good Faith Error Defense: Dealers can defend with evidence of good faith. The Act does not apply to actions authorized by law and, therefore, dealers can argue the alleged violation resulted from a good faith error and that reasonable procedures were in place to avoid such errors.

 

Statute of Limitations Defense: Dealers can assert the consumer is time-barred. This defense is based on Section 10a(e) of the Act, which imposes a three-year statute of limitations for a consumer action.

 


Protections Under the Illinois Automotive Repair Act


The Illinois Automotive Repair Act (IARA) is designed to protect consumers from fraudulent and deceptive practices in the automotive repair industry. However, it also provides protection for dealerships that operate vigilantly and adhere to its requirements.

 

By strictly following the provisions of the IARA, dealerships can mitigate risk of potential legal claims while maintaining a positive reputation. Compliance with the IARA involves keeping updated records, disclosing warranties and parts costs, and providing accurate estimates. These practices ensure that dealerships operate within the law, and foster trust and transparency to consumers.

 


Other Options for Dealerships Aside from Litigation


Litigation, often seen as the last resort for resolving disputes, can be a double-edged sword. The process is not only time-consuming and costly, but it can also potentially damage a dealership's hard-earned reputation and customer relationships.

 

Mediation, a collaborative process involving a neutral third-party mediator, empowers both the dealership and the consumer to reach a mutually acceptable resolution. Unlike litigation, mediation gives the parties more control over the outcome, allowing dealerships to address consumer grievances directly and preserve business relationships.

 

Mediation is less formal, typically faster, and less expensive than going to court, offering a more amicable path to resolution.

 

Arbitration is another alternative dispute resolution method where a neutral arbitrator hears both sides and makes a binding decision. While it shares similarities with litigation, arbitration is usually faster and can be less formal.

 

Many dealerships include arbitration clauses in their consumer contracts, which can streamline dispute resolution. Take a look at our article on arbitration here.

 

Lavelle Law can assist dealers in defending against claims brought by consumers. For further questions, please contact attorney Sarah Reusche at sreusche@lavellelaw.com or (847) 705-7555.


More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

Don’t record a conversation without knowing the law in Illinois!
By Nataly Kaiser July 29, 2025
Do you know it’s a felony in Illinois if you record a conversation without consent? The Illinois Eavesdropping Statute prohibits the secret recording of private conversations without the consent of all parties involved. Protect yourself – Get consent before you hit record! Nataly Kaiser explains.
Now through 10-1-25, Lavelle Law is offering a special discounted rate on powers of attorney for col
By Jackie R. Luthringshausen July 24, 2025
Summer Special! - Now through 10-1-25, Lavelle Law is offering a special discounted rate on powers of attorney for college-bound students and young adults. Don't send your child to college without POA docs in place! Contact Attorney Luthringshausen to start the process. jluthringshausen@lavellelaw.com or 847-705-7555
A summary of The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) and its tax implications.
By Steven A. Migala July 22, 2025
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), enacted on July 4, 2025, as Pub. L. No. 119-21, permanently extends and modifies key provisions from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) while introducing new tax benefits and limitations. The law affects individuals, seniors, children, businesses, and charitable organizations.
An in-depth discussion of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and its tax implications.
By Steven A. Migala and guest Ed Brooks July 21, 2025
Lavelle Law Shareholder Steven Migala and DHJJ Financial Principal Ed Brooks join host Jim Mitchell for an in-depth look at the new U.S. tax legislation, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, and discuss how it will impact both businesses and individuals.
An in-depth discussion of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and its tax implications.
By Steven A. Migala and guest Ed Brooks July 21, 2025
Lavelle Law Shareholder Steven Migala and DHJJ Financial Principal Ed Brooks join host Jim Mitchell for an in-depth look at the new U.S. tax legislation, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, and discuss how it will impact both businesses and individuals.
What is a fee-shifting provision?
By Sarah J. Reusché July 15, 2025
In the United States, the "American Rule" generally requires each party in a legal dispute to cover their own attorney's fees, regardless of the case's outcome. However, exceptions exist where a judge may order one party to pay the other's attorney’s fees in specific circumstances. Sarah Reusché explains.
The reconciliation process and the financial relationship between landlords and tenants.
By Theodore M. McGinn July 14, 2025
In commercial leases, particularly those involving retail or office spaces, tenants typically pay not only base rent but also a share of additional operating expenses. These include Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges, property taxes, and insurance premiums. The reconciliation of these expenses is a key process.
Delaware Supreme Court’s Analysis of Indemnification Notices in Merger and Escrow Agreements
By Steven A. Migala July 11, 2025
Attorneys drafting or reviewing indemnification clauses and notice provisions in a sale or acquisition governed by Delaware law should be aware of the recent Delaware Supreme Court decision in Thompson Street Capital Partners IV L.P. v. Sonova U.S. Hearing Instruments, LLC.
Update on Illinois Tax Changes
By Timothy M. Hughes July 10, 2025
Beginning July 1, Illinois residents will face a series of tax increases related to the Fiscal Year 2026 budget, which takes effect from July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2026. These increases are from the $55+B state budget that is supposed to generate $700+M of new taxes ranging from gasoline, short-term rentals, and more.
Contaminated Cilantro and the Need to Provide Notice to a Seller of a Breach of the Implied Warranty
By Steven A. Migala June 30, 2025
Restaurant patrons allegedly became ill from eating contaminated cilantro and filed personal injury lawsuits against two Chicago restaurants. As part of the litigation, the distributor who sold the cilantro to the restaurants, Martin Produce, Inc., filed a third-party complaint for contribution against the wholesalers.
More Posts