Blog Post

Pending Legislation to Limit Government Action on Forfeiture

Kerry M. Lavelle and Nataly Rodriguez • Jun 18, 2019

The U.S. Senate has voted to limit the ability of the Internal Revenue Service to confiscate cash from small-business owners suspected of “structuring transactions (1) ,” and keep the cash without ever filing criminal charges. The Clyde-Hirsch-Sowers RESPECT Act would restrict forfeiture for currency “structuring” only when the funds in question are derived from an illegal source or used to conceal illegal activity. It also would let property owners challenge a seizure at a prompt, post-seizure hearing. Previously, property owners targeted for structuring had to wait months or even years to present their case to a judge.

What is Forfeiture?

Forfeiture is generally defined as the taking of property by the government without compensation when taxpayers have allegedly not complied with a legal obligation or for the commission of a crime. For example, a lease contract may have a forfeiture clause that gives the lessor the right to cancel the lease and reenter the property—with statutory process— if the lessee fails to pay rent. In the context of government action, Congress and state legislatures maintain statutes that allow law enforcement to seize property on suspicion of certain criminal activity. In civil forfeiture cases, the owner of the property doesn’t even need to be guilty of a crime: the proceedings charge the property itself with involvement in, or the results of a crime.

Structuring Transactions

Structuring transactions, also known as smurfing , is the practice commonly associated with money laundering, fraud, and other financial crimes. They are called “ structuring transactions ” because the transactions follow a specific structured pattern to avoid triggering any red flags by banking institutions (2) , or to avoid having to file a currency transaction report, i.e. a form 8300, with the IRS (3) .

The bill is named partly for Institute for Justice clients Jeff Hirsch and Randy Sowers, two small-business owners who had their bank accounts seized by the IRS for alleged structuring. Through structuring laws, the IRS has routinely confiscated cash from small-business owners because they frequently deposited or withdrew cash in amounts under $10,000 which appears to be intentionally “structured” to avoid the F-8300 filing. Under current civil forfeiture laws, the IRS could then keep the money without ever filing criminal charges against the individuals.

How the Proposed Legislation Would Limit the IRS

Under the proposed legislation, within 30 days of seizing the property, the IRS must (a) make a good faith effort to find all owners of the property, and (b) notify the owners of the post-seizure hearing rights established by the bill. If the owner requests a court hearing within 30 days after notice is provided, the property must be returned unless the court holds a hearing within 30 days after notice is provided and finds one of the following apply:


  • that there is probable cause to believe that the property was derived from an illegal source; or
  • the funds were structured to conceal the violation of a criminal law; or
  • criminal conduct other than a structuring violation.

For any further discussion on civil forfeiture or the potential impact from this proposed legislation on your business, please reach out to Kerry Lavelle at klavelle@lavellelaw.com to schedule an appointment.



(1) H.R.1219 - Restraining Excessive Seizure of Property through the Exploitation of Civil Asset Forfeiture Tools Act

(2) The Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 (BSA) requires financial institutions in the United States to assist U.S. government agencies in detecting and preventing money laundering by keeping records of cash purchases of negotiable instruments, filing reports if the daily aggregate exceeds $10,000, and reporting other suspicious activity.

(3) I.R.C. §6050I requires that any person engaged in a trade or business that receives cash in excess of $10,000 in a single transaction or in related transactions must file Form 8300, Report of Cash Payments Over $10,000 Received in a Trade or Business

More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

Understanding the FTC’s Nationwide Ban on Noncompete Agreements
By Steven A. Migala 03 May, 2024
On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), in a 3-2 vote, issued its final Non-Compete Clause Rule (“Rule”) which prohibits noncompete clauses in agreements between employees and their workers. This highly anticipated Rule follows a substantially similar proposed rule from the FTC released on January 19, 2023. The Rule will not become effective until 120 days after publication in the Federal Register, and covered employers will be required to comply with the Rule by that effective date, which could come as early as August of this year. By the FTC’s estimate, this ban could affect up to one in five American workers.
Divorces that involve small and medium businesses have unique concerns and considerations.
By Joseph A. Olszowka 02 May, 2024
When determining how to distribute the marital assets between parties to a divorce, the division of an interest in a small or medium business owned by one or both of the parties is more complex and requires a careful examination of the value of the business or business interests. The Court must determine the value of the business interest in order to determine how to equitably divide all marital assets in which the parties have an interest. The Court will regularly rely on the valuation reports of the parties' experts regarding the value of the business. The business valuation expert will utilize a number of different methods in determining the value of a business. The professional appraiser will examine and assess the value of the business and provide expert testimony and reports to the parties and the Court.
Vehicle dealerships need to navigate the complex terrain of adhering to BIPA to avoid lawsuits.
By Sarah J. Reusché and Nathan Toy 30 Apr, 2024
Vehicle dealerships particularly have recently found themselves needing to navigate the complex terrain of adhering to the BIPA’s stringent requirements to avoid being targeted through lawsuits. There has been a recent noticeable uptick in class action lawsuits under the BIPA, serving as a critical wake-up call for the automotive retail industry, highlighting the need for dealerships to review and enhance their practices if they are using biometric technology.
Learn the complexities of Illinois commercial leases and avoid common pitfalls.
By Lavelle Law 29 Apr, 2024
Join us for this seminar as Lavelle Law attorneys Kelly Anderson and Chance Badertscher will unpack the complexities of Illinois commercial leases in order to prepare you for strong leasing relationships.
An essential part of a good contract is often overlooked. Learn about fee shifting provisions.
By Joseph O. Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek 23 Apr, 2024
Between the state of Illinois and federal courts, there are well over 200 statutes that deal with fee shifting provisions. They lay out ways in which legal fees may become the responsibility of one party in a lawsuit. In this video, Lavelle Law Associates Jodie Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek discuss ways that these provisions should be included in contracts and how they can be used advantageously.
Great advice on what to expect on your final walkthrough.
By Chance W. Badertscher 22 Apr, 2024
Lavelle Law real estate attorney, Chance Badertscher, recently participated in a Straight Up Chicago Investor Podcast and shared his expertise on what to expect on the final walkthrough before your real estate closing. He breaks it down and shares tips for both the buyer and the seller.
An essential part of a good contract is often overlooked. Learn about fee shifting provisions.
By Joseph O. Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek 18 Apr, 2024
Between the state of Illinois and federal courts, there are well over 200 statutes which deal with fee shifting provisions. They lay out ways in which legal fees may become the responsibility of one party in a lawsuit. Lavelle Law Associates Jodie Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek discuss ways that these provisions should be included in contracts and how they can be used advantageously.
Emergency Estate Tax Savings - a Lavelle Law Success Story
By Estate Planning and Administration 16 Apr, 2024
Our team worked very quickly (in a matter of just a few days) to establish temporary guardianship of the client, and – most importantly – successfully argued for the judge to authorize the guardian to execute and finalize the estate plan documents on the client’s behalf. Finalizing the estate planning documents in advance of the client’s death saved the estate and the client’s family nearly $500,000 in estate taxes.
Watch this video if you are considering setting up a medical spa in Illinois.
By Eso H. Akunne 12 Apr, 2024
Businesses classified as medical spas have a variety of special considerations that must be adhered to in the state of Illinois. In this video, Lavelle Law attorney Eso Akunne discusses critical issues that must be met to operate with state laws. If you are interested in getting involved in this rapidly growing industry be sure to watch this video.
Time to Claim a Refund Expires on May 17, 2024 Deadline, Then $1 Billion in Refunds Will be Lost.
By Timothy M. Hughes 10 Apr, 2024
The IRS recently announced that almost 940,000 people across the nation have unclaimed refunds for tax year 2020 but face a May 17 deadline to submit their tax returns. The IRS estimates more than $1 billion in refunds remain unclaimed because people have not filed their 2020 tax returns yet. The average median refund is $932 for 2020. The IRS estimates that about 36,200 Illinois taxpayers may lose $40,608,000 in potential refunds.
More Posts
Share by: