Blog Post

Interim Final Rules on PPP Loan Forgiveness

Steven A. Migala • Jun 01, 2020
On May 22, 2020, the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) released an Interim Final Rule on Loan Forgiveness (“Forgiveness Rule”) describing the costs eligible for forgiveness under the Payroll Protection Program (“PPP”) loans and reductions of the forgiveness amount. The SBA also issued an Interim Final Rule on SBA Loan Review Procedures and Related Borrower and Lender Responsibilities (“Process Rule”) explaining the loan forgiveness process in more detail. This article provides the key takeaways of the Forgiveness Rule:

Paid or Incurred
  • Payroll and nonpayroll costs eligible for forgiveness may include costs paid or incurred during the covered period.
Payroll Costs
  • Borrowers with a biweekly (or more frequent) payroll schedule may choose either the eight weeks following loan disbursement or eight weeks (56 days) beginning on the first day of its first pay period following loan disbursement solely for purposes of determining which payroll costs are eligible for forgiveness.  Example: A borrower with a bi-weekly payroll schedule has a covered period that begins on June 1 and ends on July 26. The first day of the borrower’s first payroll cycle that starts in the covered period is June 7. The borrower may elect to use the covered period or an alternative payroll covered period for payroll cost purposes that starts on June 7 and ends 55 days later (for a total of 56 days) on August 1.
  • Payroll costs are considered paid on the day that paychecks are distributed or the borrower originates an ACH credit transaction. Payroll costs are generally incurred on the day the employee’s pay is earned (i.e., on the day the employee worked). Payroll costs incurred during the borrower’s last pay period of the covered period or the alternative payroll covered period are eligible for forgiveness if paid on or before the next regular payroll date.
  • Payroll costs include bonuses and hazard pay, but such payments are included with an employee’s salary, wages, and commission payments for purposes of applying the annualized $100,000 limit on each employee’s cash compensation. Eligible payroll costs also include payments to furloughed employees and employees not able to perform their day-to-day duties, whether due to lack of economic demand or public health considerations.
  • Loan forgiveness for owner-employees and self-employed individuals’ payroll compensation can be no more than the lesser of 8/52 (approximately 15.38%) of 2019 compensation or $15,385 per individual in total across all businesses. No forgiveness is provided for retirement or health insurance contributions for self-employed individuals, including Schedule C filers and general partners, as such expenses are paid out of their net self-employment income.
Nonpayroll Costs
  • Nonpayroll costs eligible for forgiveness include costs paid during the covered period, or incurred during the covered period and paid on or before the next regular billing date, even if the billing date is after the covered period. A borrower may not elect to use the alternative payroll covered period for purposes of determining eligible nonpayroll costs – it must use only the covered period.  Example: A borrower’s covered period begins on June 1 and ends on July 26. The borrower pays its May and June electricity bill during the covered period and pays its July electricity bill on August 10, which is the next regular billing date. The borrower may seek loan forgiveness for its May and June electricity bills because they were paid during the covered period. In addition, the borrower may seek loan forgiveness for the portion of its July electricity bill through July 26 (the end of the covered period), because it was incurred during the covered period and paid on the next regular billing date.
  • Advance payments of interest on a covered mortgage obligation are not eligible for loan forgiveness because the CARES Act’s loan forgiveness provisions regarding mortgage obligations specifically exclude “prepayments.”

Reductions in Forgiveness Amount
  • The loan forgiveness amount will not be reduced if the borrower laid off or reduced the hours of an employee, provided that the borrower offered to rehire the same employee for the same salary and the same number of hours, or if the borrower offered to restore the reduction in hours, but the employee declined the offer. The borrower must maintain records documenting the offer and rejection, and must inform the applicable state unemployment insurance office of such employee’s rejected offer of reemployment within 30 days of the employee’s rejection of the offer.
  • A reduction in FTE employees during the covered period or the alternative payroll covered period generally reduces the loan forgiveness amount by the same percentage as the percentage reduction in FTE employees. The borrower must first select a reference period: (i) February 15, 2019 through June 30, 2019; (ii) January 1, 2020 through February 29, 2020; or (iii) in the case of a seasonal employer, either of the two preceding methods or a consecutive 12-week period between May 1, 2019 and September 15, 2019.
  • A reduction in an employee’s salary or wages in excess of 25% will generally result in a reduction in the loan forgiveness amount, unless an exception applies. This reduction calculation is performed on a per employee basis, not in the aggregate.
  • To ensure that borrowers are not doubly penalized, the above salary/wage reduction applies only to the portion of the decline in employee salary and wages that is not attributable to the FTE reduction (i.e., the hourly wage did not change).
  • When an employee of the borrower is fired for cause, voluntarily resigns, or voluntarily requests a reduced schedule during the covered period or the alternative payroll covered period (FTE reduction event), the borrower may count such employee at the same full-time equivalency level before the FTE reduction event when calculating the FTE employee reduction penalty. Borrowers must maintain records demonstrating that each such employee was fired for cause, voluntarily resigned, or voluntarily requested a schedule reduction. The borrower must provide such documentation upon request.

If you have any questions about the Forgiveness Rule or Process Rule, contact Steven Migala at smigala@lavellelaw.com or (847) 705-7555.

More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

Understanding the FTC’s Nationwide Ban on Noncompete Agreements
By Steven A. Migala 03 May, 2024
On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), in a 3-2 vote, issued its final Non-Compete Clause Rule (“Rule”) which prohibits noncompete clauses in agreements between employees and their workers. This highly anticipated Rule follows a substantially similar proposed rule from the FTC released on January 19, 2023. The Rule will not become effective until 120 days after publication in the Federal Register, and covered employers will be required to comply with the Rule by that effective date, which could come as early as August of this year. By the FTC’s estimate, this ban could affect up to one in five American workers.
Divorces that involve small and medium businesses have unique concerns and considerations.
By Joseph A. Olszowka 02 May, 2024
When determining how to distribute the marital assets between parties to a divorce, the division of an interest in a small or medium business owned by one or both of the parties is more complex and requires a careful examination of the value of the business or business interests. The Court must determine the value of the business interest in order to determine how to equitably divide all marital assets in which the parties have an interest. The Court will regularly rely on the valuation reports of the parties' experts regarding the value of the business. The business valuation expert will utilize a number of different methods in determining the value of a business. The professional appraiser will examine and assess the value of the business and provide expert testimony and reports to the parties and the Court.
Vehicle dealerships need to navigate the complex terrain of adhering to BIPA to avoid lawsuits.
By Sarah J. Reusché and Nathan Toy 30 Apr, 2024
Vehicle dealerships particularly have recently found themselves needing to navigate the complex terrain of adhering to the BIPA’s stringent requirements to avoid being targeted through lawsuits. There has been a recent noticeable uptick in class action lawsuits under the BIPA, serving as a critical wake-up call for the automotive retail industry, highlighting the need for dealerships to review and enhance their practices if they are using biometric technology.
Learn the complexities of Illinois commercial leases and avoid common pitfalls.
By Lavelle Law 29 Apr, 2024
Join us for this seminar as Lavelle Law attorneys Kelly Anderson and Chance Badertscher will unpack the complexities of Illinois commercial leases in order to prepare you for strong leasing relationships.
An essential part of a good contract is often overlooked. Learn about fee shifting provisions.
By Joseph O. Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek 23 Apr, 2024
Between the state of Illinois and federal courts, there are well over 200 statutes that deal with fee shifting provisions. They lay out ways in which legal fees may become the responsibility of one party in a lawsuit. In this video, Lavelle Law Associates Jodie Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek discuss ways that these provisions should be included in contracts and how they can be used advantageously.
Great advice on what to expect on your final walkthrough.
By Chance W. Badertscher 22 Apr, 2024
Lavelle Law real estate attorney, Chance Badertscher, recently participated in a Straight Up Chicago Investor Podcast and shared his expertise on what to expect on the final walkthrough before your real estate closing. He breaks it down and shares tips for both the buyer and the seller.
An essential part of a good contract is often overlooked. Learn about fee shifting provisions.
By Joseph O. Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek 18 Apr, 2024
Between the state of Illinois and federal courts, there are well over 200 statutes which deal with fee shifting provisions. They lay out ways in which legal fees may become the responsibility of one party in a lawsuit. Lavelle Law Associates Jodie Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek discuss ways that these provisions should be included in contracts and how they can be used advantageously.
Emergency Estate Tax Savings - a Lavelle Law Success Story
By Estate Planning and Administration 16 Apr, 2024
Our team worked very quickly (in a matter of just a few days) to establish temporary guardianship of the client, and – most importantly – successfully argued for the judge to authorize the guardian to execute and finalize the estate plan documents on the client’s behalf. Finalizing the estate planning documents in advance of the client’s death saved the estate and the client’s family nearly $500,000 in estate taxes.
Watch this video if you are considering setting up a medical spa in Illinois.
By Eso H. Akunne 12 Apr, 2024
Businesses classified as medical spas have a variety of special considerations that must be adhered to in the state of Illinois. In this video, Lavelle Law attorney Eso Akunne discusses critical issues that must be met to operate with state laws. If you are interested in getting involved in this rapidly growing industry be sure to watch this video.
Time to Claim a Refund Expires on May 17, 2024 Deadline, Then $1 Billion in Refunds Will be Lost.
By Timothy M. Hughes 10 Apr, 2024
The IRS recently announced that almost 940,000 people across the nation have unclaimed refunds for tax year 2020 but face a May 17 deadline to submit their tax returns. The IRS estimates more than $1 billion in refunds remain unclaimed because people have not filed their 2020 tax returns yet. The average median refund is $932 for 2020. The IRS estimates that about 36,200 Illinois taxpayers may lose $40,608,000 in potential refunds.
More Posts
Share by: