ESOP Repurchase Obligations in Bankruptcy - a Podcast
Roman Perchyts • July 7, 2020
An employee stock ownership plan (an “ESOP”) is a type of employee benefit plan regulated by the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). Employees who are ESOP participants are in many ways treated similarly to shareholders of their company. This applies to bankruptcy as well, which means that ESOP participants are effectively “last in line” and usually get nothing if the company is liquidated. However, recent case law suggests that this treatment may not apply to repurchase obligations toward former employees. Repurchase obligations may be treated as debt, which may give an ESOP participant higher priority in bankruptcy putting them next in line after the senior secured lender. In this podcast, Lavelle Law attorney Roman Perchyts answers questions about ESOPs and bankruptcy and addresses concerns that banks may have regarding the priority of repurchasing obligations in bankruptcy.
More News & Resources
Lavelle Law News and Events
Thinking of selling your business ahead of retirement? Business owners should begin preparing when they enter the “red zone” before retirement - not wait until they’re ready to retire. Kerry Lavelle explains this and more in the Lavelle Law Minute video, "Options and Tips for Selling Your Business."

On August 20, 2026, the Internal Revenue Service announced a digitally authenticated Tax Compliance Report available through IRS Individual Online Accounts.
Taxpayers can securely obtain and download the report when applying for a job, a loan, a government benefit, or another service that requires tax compliance info.

On August 5, 2026, the Internal Revenue Service issued Notice 2026-28 providing guidance on the employer credit for paid family and medical leave (“PFML”) under the Working Families Tax Cuts (“WFTC”). The WFTC makes permanent and expands eligibility and coverage for employers offering PFML benefits to employees.

Thinking about using AI to represent yourself in litigation? Think again. It is well-documented that pro se litigants are less likely to prevail compared to their represented counterparts. Regardless, AI has provided people with a false sense of security, tempting them to represent themselves regardless.






