Blog Post

Equal Access: Does the ADA Require Businesses to Make Websites Accessible to Blind and Visually Impaired Users?

Thomas J. Fox • Apr 22, 2020
Litigation involving the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”) has recently focused on the ability to access websites in addition to physical locations. For example, blind and other visually-impaired people can enjoy the Internet through specialized “screen reader” software that reads text aloud to them. As that software becomes more widely available, businesses are increasingly expected to design their websites in a way that is compatible with this software. When businesses fail to do this, blind users are placed at a disadvantage. That obstacle has only become more severe in light of the coronavirus, which makes it difficult or even dangerous to visit the physical location of a business when its website is not accessible.

Because the ADA is a well-known law, most businesses are aware they must make their physical locations accessible to disabled customers. However, it is less clear how far businesses must go to make similar accommodations online. For example, last year the Supreme Court declined to step in and hear the appeal of Robles v. Domino’s Pizza, a Ninth-Circuit decision. In Robles, the court held that Domino’s had an obligation under the ADA to make its website accessible to blind users because there was a “nexus” between the site and Domino’s physical locations, and that it was no excuse that the Department of Justice has not explicitly said what a business must do for its website to comply with the ADA. See Robles v. Domino’s Pizza, LLC, 913 F.3d 898 (9th Cir. 2019). Because the Supreme Court did not weigh in, this area of law remains uncertain.

This is especially true in the Seventh Circuit, which oversees federal courts in much of the Midwest, including Illinois. Here, courts have not yet directly ruled on whether businesses’ websites must support screen reader software. For example, the Seventh Circuit recently had the chance to answer this question but did not do so because the plaintiff did not have standing to sue. See Carello v. Aurora Policemen Credit Union, 930 F.3d 830, 835 (7th Cir. 2019). In Carello, the plaintiff could not access a credit union’s site but was unable to sue under the ADA because he was ineligible to join that credit union. Id. at 832, 834. Accordingly, the court did not address the more substantive questions at issue.

However, the Seventh Circuit has indicated that when this issue arises, it will hold in favor of blind and visually-impaired users. For instance, in Doe v. Mutual of Omaha, the court noted the breadth of the ADA, and said it meant an owner of a “store, hotel, restaurant … Web site, or other facility (whether in physical space or electronic space) … that is open to the public cannot exclude disabled persons.” See Doe v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., 179 F.3d 557, 559 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Morgan v. Retirement Plan of Pillsbury Co., 268 F.3d 456, 459 (7th Cir. 2001) (saying “an insurance company can no more refuse to sell a policy to a disabled person over the internet than a furniture store can refuse to sell furniture to a disabled person who enters the store”). Indeed, the Seventh Circuit appears even more favorable to disabled plaintiffs than the Ninth Circuit. While the Ninth Circuit in Robles said there must be a “nexus” between a store’s website and physical location, the Seventh Circuit in Doe and Morgan did not indicate that it required this, implying that even a purely web-based business must comply with the ADA.

At this point, the ADA’s scope remains hotly contested with respect to website accessibility and will remain that way until the Supreme Court or Department of Justice offers further guidance on exactly what businesses must do to comply with the ADA. For now, the Seventh Circuit’s case law continues to favor blind internet users and anyone else who requires accommodations to view a website. Moreover, would-be plaintiffs have an easier path to suing under the ADA because they can recoup their attorneys’ fees if they prevail (as can business defendants). See 42 U.S.C. § 12205.

For businesses, this means they should exercise caution in planning how to make their websites accessible to a wider audience, including those who require assistance to view websites. Conversely, blind and visually-impaired internet users have an increasingly stronger voice in making sure they can access the websites they need to, and have a tool to push businesses towards greater accessibility. 

If you have questions or would like more information on this subject, please feel free to contact attorney Thomas Fox at 847-705-7555 or tfox@lavellelaw.com.

More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

Understanding the FTC’s Nationwide Ban on Noncompete Agreements
By Steven A. Migala 03 May, 2024
On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), in a 3-2 vote, issued its final Non-Compete Clause Rule (“Rule”) which prohibits noncompete clauses in agreements between employees and their workers. This highly anticipated Rule follows a substantially similar proposed rule from the FTC released on January 19, 2023. The Rule will not become effective until 120 days after publication in the Federal Register, and covered employers will be required to comply with the Rule by that effective date, which could come as early as August of this year. By the FTC’s estimate, this ban could affect up to one in five American workers.
Divorces that involve small and medium businesses have unique concerns and considerations.
By Joseph A. Olszowka 02 May, 2024
When determining how to distribute the marital assets between parties to a divorce, the division of an interest in a small or medium business owned by one or both of the parties is more complex and requires a careful examination of the value of the business or business interests. The Court must determine the value of the business interest in order to determine how to equitably divide all marital assets in which the parties have an interest. The Court will regularly rely on the valuation reports of the parties' experts regarding the value of the business. The business valuation expert will utilize a number of different methods in determining the value of a business. The professional appraiser will examine and assess the value of the business and provide expert testimony and reports to the parties and the Court.
Vehicle dealerships need to navigate the complex terrain of adhering to BIPA to avoid lawsuits.
By Sarah J. Reusché and Nathan Toy 30 Apr, 2024
Vehicle dealerships particularly have recently found themselves needing to navigate the complex terrain of adhering to the BIPA’s stringent requirements to avoid being targeted through lawsuits. There has been a recent noticeable uptick in class action lawsuits under the BIPA, serving as a critical wake-up call for the automotive retail industry, highlighting the need for dealerships to review and enhance their practices if they are using biometric technology.
Learn the complexities of Illinois commercial leases and avoid common pitfalls.
By Lavelle Law 29 Apr, 2024
Join us for this seminar as Lavelle Law attorneys Kelly Anderson and Chance Badertscher will unpack the complexities of Illinois commercial leases in order to prepare you for strong leasing relationships.
An essential part of a good contract is often overlooked. Learn about fee shifting provisions.
By Joseph O. Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek 23 Apr, 2024
Between the state of Illinois and federal courts, there are well over 200 statutes that deal with fee shifting provisions. They lay out ways in which legal fees may become the responsibility of one party in a lawsuit. In this video, Lavelle Law Associates Jodie Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek discuss ways that these provisions should be included in contracts and how they can be used advantageously.
Great advice on what to expect on your final walkthrough.
By Chance W. Badertscher 22 Apr, 2024
Lavelle Law real estate attorney, Chance Badertscher, recently participated in a Straight Up Chicago Investor Podcast and shared his expertise on what to expect on the final walkthrough before your real estate closing. He breaks it down and shares tips for both the buyer and the seller.
An essential part of a good contract is often overlooked. Learn about fee shifting provisions.
By Joseph O. Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek 18 Apr, 2024
Between the state of Illinois and federal courts, there are well over 200 statutes which deal with fee shifting provisions. They lay out ways in which legal fees may become the responsibility of one party in a lawsuit. Lavelle Law Associates Jodie Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek discuss ways that these provisions should be included in contracts and how they can be used advantageously.
Emergency Estate Tax Savings - a Lavelle Law Success Story
By Estate Planning and Administration 16 Apr, 2024
Our team worked very quickly (in a matter of just a few days) to establish temporary guardianship of the client, and – most importantly – successfully argued for the judge to authorize the guardian to execute and finalize the estate plan documents on the client’s behalf. Finalizing the estate planning documents in advance of the client’s death saved the estate and the client’s family nearly $500,000 in estate taxes.
Watch this video if you are considering setting up a medical spa in Illinois.
By Eso H. Akunne 12 Apr, 2024
Businesses classified as medical spas have a variety of special considerations that must be adhered to in the state of Illinois. In this video, Lavelle Law attorney Eso Akunne discusses critical issues that must be met to operate with state laws. If you are interested in getting involved in this rapidly growing industry be sure to watch this video.
Time to Claim a Refund Expires on May 17, 2024 Deadline, Then $1 Billion in Refunds Will be Lost.
By Timothy M. Hughes 10 Apr, 2024
The IRS recently announced that almost 940,000 people across the nation have unclaimed refunds for tax year 2020 but face a May 17 deadline to submit their tax returns. The IRS estimates more than $1 billion in refunds remain unclaimed because people have not filed their 2020 tax returns yet. The average median refund is $932 for 2020. The IRS estimates that about 36,200 Illinois taxpayers may lose $40,608,000 in potential refunds.
More Posts
Share by: