Banking and Business Monthly – February 2020

Steven A. Migala • February 6, 2020

FTC’S REVISED HART-SCOTT-RODINO FILING THRESHOLDS FOR M&A TRANSACTIONS AND THE FTC’S ADJUSTED THRESHOLDS FOR INTERLOCKING DIRECTORATES

A. FTC’s Revised Hart-Scott-Rodino Filing Thresholds for M&A Transactions

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced revised thresholds used for pre-acquisition filings under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (“HSR”). These take effect on February 27, 2020. Under the new thresholds, the parties to a merger, consolidation or acquisition of voting securities or substantial assets will in most cases need to file pre-acquisition notifications with the FTC and the Department of Justice and observe the HSR waiting periods before closing if the transaction meets one or more tests which look at both the size of the transaction and the sizes of the persons in the transaction.

Size of Transaction: This test is both a floor below which no filing is required and a threshold for automatic filing regardless of the size of the persons discussed below. No filings are required for transactions under $94 million this year notwithstanding the size of the persons. If the value of the securities or assets exceeds $376 million, then the persons must report the transaction notwithstanding the size of the persons.

Size of Person: If the value of the securities and assets held as a result of the transaction is between $94 million and $376 million, the transaction must be reported in most cases if either the acquired or acquiring party has annual net sales or total assets of at least $18.8 million and the other party to the transaction has at least $188 million in annual net sales or total assets. For the purposes of applying the above thresholds, “person” means the ultimate parent entity of the party engaged in the transaction.

Filing Fees: The amounts of the filing fees have not changed, but the thresholds are increased as follows:


  • Transactions valued at more than $94 million but less than $188 million pay $45,000.
  • Transactions valued at $188 million or more but less than $940.1 million pay $125,000.
  • Transactions valued at $940.1 million or more pay $280,000.

Note that certain exemptions may apply depending on the nature of the transaction and the nature and location of the assets and entities involved. Consequently, additional analysis is often required before making a final determination regarding the need for an HSR filing. Counsel is recommended, as noncompliance with HSR leads to significant penalties. We can assist with this analysis.


B. FTC’s Adjusted Thresholds for Interlocking Directorates

The FTC also published revised thresholds for interlocking directorates under Section 8 of the Clayton Act. Section 8 generally prohibits one person from serving as a director or officer of two competing corporations if each has capital, surplus and undivided profits (i.e., net worth) of more than $38,204,000 (up from $36,564,000). Section 8 provides for several exceptions where competitive overlaps are “too small to have competitive significance.” For example, the parties will not violate Section 8 where the competing sales of either corporation are less than $3,820,400 (up from $3,656,400); the competing sales of either corporation are less than 2% of the corporation’s total sales; or the competing sales of each corporation are less than 4% of the corporation’s total sales.

As with HSR above, failure to comply with Section 8 may have dire consequences for applicable companies and individuals. Businesses should consult with their counsel to determine whether Section 8 applies before proceeding with a potential transaction within its scope.


Steven A. Migala is a partner at Lavelle Law and possesses over 20 years of providing excellent representation to banks, businesses, and individuals in a variety of matters. He can be contacted at (847) 705-7555 and smigala@lavellelaw.com.

More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

A summary of NADA’s statement defending state franchise laws.
By Sarah J. Reusché August 14, 2025
Recently, OEMs like Tesla and Rivian implemented a direct-to-consumer approach that many state motor vehicle dealer laws are intended to prohibit. On May 27, 2025, the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) submitted a Public Comment, defending state franchise laws.
Free Family Law Seminar in Schaumburg, IL
By Family Law August 11, 2025
Join Lavelle Law for an informative presentation tailored to individuals seeking expert guidance on critical family law matters. Our experienced family law attorneys will break down three key areas — prenuptial/postnuptial agreements, collaborative divorce, and child custody.
IRS outlined key points for tax year 2025 relating to the OBBBA provisions.
By Timothy M. Hughes August 10, 2025
On August 7, 2025, the IRS announced that, as part of its phased implementation of the July 4th One Big Beautiful Bill Act, there will be no changes to certain information returns or withholding tables for tax year 2025 related to the new law. The IRS outlined key relevant changes to tax filers effective for '25 - '28.
Saved or client $1 Million in Estate Tax
By Estate Administration July 30, 2025
Due to Lavelle’s extensive knowledge in estate and gift tax, we were able to generate a combined federal and Illinois estate tax savings of $1 million for the client.
Don’t record a conversation without knowing the law in Illinois!
By Nataly Kaiser July 29, 2025
Do you know it’s a felony in Illinois if you record a conversation without consent? The Illinois Eavesdropping Statute prohibits the secret recording of private conversations without the consent of all parties involved. Protect yourself – Get consent before you hit record! Nataly Kaiser explains.
Now through 10-1-25, Lavelle Law is offering a special discounted rate on powers of attorney for col
By Jackie R. Luthringshausen July 24, 2025
Summer Special! - Now through 10-1-25, Lavelle Law is offering a special discounted rate on powers of attorney for college-bound students and young adults. Don't send your child to college without POA docs in place! Contact Attorney Luthringshausen to start the process. jluthringshausen@lavellelaw.com or 847-705-7555
A summary of The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) and its tax implications.
By Steven A. Migala July 22, 2025
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), enacted on July 4, 2025, as Pub. L. No. 119-21, permanently extends and modifies key provisions from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) while introducing new tax benefits and limitations. The law affects individuals, seniors, children, businesses, and charitable organizations.
An in-depth discussion of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and its tax implications.
By Steven A. Migala and guest Ed Brooks July 21, 2025
Lavelle Law Shareholder Steven Migala and DHJJ Financial Principal Ed Brooks join host Jim Mitchell for an in-depth look at the new U.S. tax legislation, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, and discuss how it will impact both businesses and individuals.
An in-depth discussion of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and its tax implications.
By Steven A. Migala and guest Ed Brooks July 21, 2025
Lavelle Law Shareholder Steven Migala and DHJJ Financial Principal Ed Brooks join host Jim Mitchell for an in-depth look at the new U.S. tax legislation, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, and discuss how it will impact both businesses and individuals.
What is a fee-shifting provision?
By Sarah J. Reusché July 15, 2025
In the United States, the "American Rule" generally requires each party in a legal dispute to cover their own attorney's fees, regardless of the case's outcome. However, exceptions exist where a judge may order one party to pay the other's attorney’s fees in specific circumstances. Sarah Reusché explains.
More Posts