What are Preference and Insider Payments?
Timothy M. Hughes • May 18, 2020
Under bankruptcy law, all creditors of the same priority need to be treated equally by the debtor. When a debtor repays one creditor and not others, it is considered a “preference” because the debtor is providing special treatment to a single creditor. All creditors of the same priority need to be treated equally under bankruptcy law. If a debtor pays one person or one entity and not others, the bankruptcy trustee has the right to void that transaction and bring the money back into the debtor’s bankruptcy estate so that all the debtor’s creditors will be paid the same percentage. The preference period for a normal creditor (i.e. credit card companies) is 90 days versus one year for an insider because transactions with insiders are more closely scrutinized. The question of whether a creditor is considered an “insider” in a bankruptcy case is an important distinction.
If a debtor has repaid a creditor a significant amount of money before filing for bankruptcy, it is important to disclose the transaction(s) related to the payment(s) in detail. This includes identifying the payees who are insiders. The bankruptcy code defines an “insider” to include a relative of the debtor or a general partner of the debtor. And “relative” is defined to mean an individual related by affinity or consanguinity within the third degree as determined by the common law, or an individual in a step or adoptive relationship within such third degree.
Courts have also defined insider more broadly to include a close family friend (but not relative), Courts have also looked at whether there is a close enough relationship between the debtor and the creditor that their transactions should be scrutinized at more than regular arms-length transactions. The courts look at whether the creditor could exert any influence over the debtor. If the creditor has some control over the debtor, then the creditor could be defined as an “insider.”
In addition to possibly undoing preference payments described above, a bankruptcy trustee has Avoidance Powers to go back four years to undo a transaction if there was a fraudulent transfer or transfer for less than fair market value. The chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee is an individual appointed by the Department of Justice to oversee the administration of a chapter 7 bankruptcy case. The trustee’s main duty is to examine the debtor under oath to determine whether or not there are any assets to be administered for the benefit of creditors. In most chapter 7 bankruptcy cases, there are no assets for a trustee to administer. This is because the state of Illinois exemption laws provide debtors with the ability to protect a specific amount of personal property while going through the bankruptcy process. However, the trustee also has avoidance powers. These powers give him the ability to undo certain transactions if it was done under two specific scenarios: 1) Fraudulent Transfers -- an act(s) made with actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors, and 2) Transferred Asset For Less Than Fair Market Value – an act(s) made for less than the fair market value by a debtor who was insolvent at the time of the transfer.
If you would like more details, please do not hesitate to call our office. Our office has been successful in helping consumers with collection problems for over 28 years. If you have a debt or tax problem, please contact me at (847) 705-9698 or thughes@lavellelaw.com
and find out how. we can help you. We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code.
More News & Resources
Lavelle Law News and Events
Beginning 3.1.26, new federal regulations issued by FinCEN will significantly affect how certain residential real estate closings are handled. Issued under the authority of the Bank Secrecy Act, the rule requires the reporting of specified non-financed residential real estate transfers involving legal entities & trusts
Certain income taxes can be discharged in bankruptcy if they meet a four-part test, the last test being a subjective test. On January 20, 2026, Judge Bentley of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the SDNY issued a 46-page judgment determining that a chapter 7 debtor did not meet the fourth test.
On January 14, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that political candidates can bring lawsuits over election rules. In Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections, the Court held that a candidate for office has the right to challenge state rules about how votes are counted.
As seen in North Shore City Lifestyle. Lavelle Law attorney, Sarah Reusché, is featured in the February 2026 issue of North Shore City Lifestyle magazine. Sarah isn't just an exceptional attorney; she's a true community advocate.
A small business owner sought to acquire the assets of a mall-based fast food franchise. The client needed experienced legal guidance to navigate a complex, multi-party transaction involving the seller, the franchisor, the mall’s leasing agency, and a lending institution providing bank financing.
The January broadcast of Elgin’s "Chamber Chat" with EAC President Carol Gieske, features Lavelle Law Shareholder Steve Migala and KCT Credit Union’s Yvonne Irving.
In this video, Lavelle Law attorney Nataly Kaiser provides crucial legal tips if you are named as agent under a Power of Attorney for Property. Know the law before you act!
New Year, New Employment Laws: Key Illinois Changes Effective 2026 - a Lavelle Law Breakfast Briefs seminar.
Stay ahead of Illinois’ evolving employment law landscape and help safeguard your organization in 2026. Register now for this targeted, must-attend session.
Bankruptcy Can Discharge Some Tax Liabilities. The toll of the high inflation of the past few years, combined with lingering economic aftershocks from COVID-19, has created a great amount of economic uncertainty for many people.
In the News: Elgin Area Chamber announces attorney Steven A. Migala as 2026 board chair.
