What are Preference and Insider Payments?
Timothy M. Hughes • May 18, 2020
Under bankruptcy law, all creditors of the same priority need to be treated equally by the debtor. When a debtor repays one creditor and not others, it is considered a “preference” because the debtor is providing special treatment to a single creditor. All creditors of the same priority need to be treated equally under bankruptcy law. If a debtor pays one person or one entity and not others, the bankruptcy trustee has the right to void that transaction and bring the money back into the debtor’s bankruptcy estate so that all the debtor’s creditors will be paid the same percentage. The preference period for a normal creditor (i.e. credit card companies) is 90 days versus one year for an insider because transactions with insiders are more closely scrutinized. The question of whether a creditor is considered an “insider” in a bankruptcy case is an important distinction.
If a debtor has repaid a creditor a significant amount of money before filing for bankruptcy, it is important to disclose the transaction(s) related to the payment(s) in detail. This includes identifying the payees who are insiders. The bankruptcy code defines an “insider” to include a relative of the debtor or a general partner of the debtor. And “relative” is defined to mean an individual related by affinity or consanguinity within the third degree as determined by the common law, or an individual in a step or adoptive relationship within such third degree.
Courts have also defined insider more broadly to include a close family friend (but not relative), Courts have also looked at whether there is a close enough relationship between the debtor and the creditor that their transactions should be scrutinized at more than regular arms-length transactions. The courts look at whether the creditor could exert any influence over the debtor. If the creditor has some control over the debtor, then the creditor could be defined as an “insider.”
In addition to possibly undoing preference payments described above, a bankruptcy trustee has Avoidance Powers to go back four years to undo a transaction if there was a fraudulent transfer or transfer for less than fair market value. The chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee is an individual appointed by the Department of Justice to oversee the administration of a chapter 7 bankruptcy case. The trustee’s main duty is to examine the debtor under oath to determine whether or not there are any assets to be administered for the benefit of creditors. In most chapter 7 bankruptcy cases, there are no assets for a trustee to administer. This is because the state of Illinois exemption laws provide debtors with the ability to protect a specific amount of personal property while going through the bankruptcy process. However, the trustee also has avoidance powers. These powers give him the ability to undo certain transactions if it was done under two specific scenarios: 1) Fraudulent Transfers -- an act(s) made with actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors, and 2) Transferred Asset For Less Than Fair Market Value – an act(s) made for less than the fair market value by a debtor who was insolvent at the time of the transfer.
If you would like more details, please do not hesitate to call our office. Our office has been successful in helping consumers with collection problems for over 28 years. If you have a debt or tax problem, please contact me at (847) 705-9698 or thughes@lavellelaw.com
and find out how. we can help you. We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code.
More News & Resources
Lavelle Law News and Events
Taylor Swift’s engagement to Travis Kelce has made a big splash in the news. In this podcast, Lavelle Law family law attorneys Joe Olszowka and Kristina Buchthal Alkass discuss the importance of prenuptial agreements - and not just for the wealthy.
The U.S. Treasury Department issued a preliminary list of nearly 70 jobs that qualify for “no tax on tips.” The occupations include a wide range of services spanning from Rickshaw drivers to digital content creators.
On August 20, 2025, the First District of the Illinois Appellate Court decided Chicago Title Land Trust Co. v. Watkin, 2025 IL App (1st) 241354 (August 20, 2025). At issue in Watkin was whether the expiration of the statute of limitations barring enforcement of a mortgage also extinguishes the mortgage lien.
The Illinois General Assembly has updated the Probate Act of 1975 to improve the small estate affidavit process for settling estates without formal probate. Effective immediately, this amendment offers significant benefits for Illinois residents managing a loved one's estate.
A common consideration in a divorce case is who will get to keep the family pet. Illinois has a specific law that addresses this issue. In this video, divorce attorney Joe Olszowka explains the various factors the court considers when there is a pet involved in an Illinois family law case.
Lavelle Saves Homeowner from Real Estate Tax Bill Disaster - In the end, our client clawed back ownership of his family’s home and was made whole on the attorney fees he was forced to pay to rectify this unfortunate situation.
Recently, OEMs like Tesla and Rivian implemented a direct-to-consumer approach that many state motor vehicle dealer laws are intended to prohibit. On May 27, 2025, the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) submitted a Public Comment, defending state franchise laws.
Join Lavelle Law for an informative presentation tailored to individuals seeking expert guidance on critical family law matters. Our experienced family law attorneys will break down three key areas — prenuptial/postnuptial agreements, collaborative divorce, and child custody.
On August 7, 2025, the IRS announced that, as part of its phased implementation of the July 4th One Big Beautiful Bill Act, there will be no changes to certain information returns or withholding tables for tax year 2025 related to the new law. The IRS outlined key relevant changes to tax filers effective for '25 - '28.
Due to Lavelle’s extensive knowledge in estate and gift tax, we were able to generate a combined federal and Illinois estate tax savings of $1 million for the client.
