What are Preference and Insider Payments?
Timothy M. Hughes • May 18, 2020
Under bankruptcy law, all creditors of the same priority need to be treated equally by the debtor. When a debtor repays one creditor and not others, it is considered a “preference” because the debtor is providing special treatment to a single creditor. All creditors of the same priority need to be treated equally under bankruptcy law. If a debtor pays one person or one entity and not others, the bankruptcy trustee has the right to void that transaction and bring the money back into the debtor’s bankruptcy estate so that all the debtor’s creditors will be paid the same percentage. The preference period for a normal creditor (i.e. credit card companies) is 90 days versus one year for an insider because transactions with insiders are more closely scrutinized. The question of whether a creditor is considered an “insider” in a bankruptcy case is an important distinction.
If a debtor has repaid a creditor a significant amount of money before filing for bankruptcy, it is important to disclose the transaction(s) related to the payment(s) in detail. This includes identifying the payees who are insiders. The bankruptcy code defines an “insider” to include a relative of the debtor or a general partner of the debtor. And “relative” is defined to mean an individual related by affinity or consanguinity within the third degree as determined by the common law, or an individual in a step or adoptive relationship within such third degree.
Courts have also defined insider more broadly to include a close family friend (but not relative), Courts have also looked at whether there is a close enough relationship between the debtor and the creditor that their transactions should be scrutinized at more than regular arms-length transactions. The courts look at whether the creditor could exert any influence over the debtor. If the creditor has some control over the debtor, then the creditor could be defined as an “insider.”
In addition to possibly undoing preference payments described above, a bankruptcy trustee has Avoidance Powers to go back four years to undo a transaction if there was a fraudulent transfer or transfer for less than fair market value. The chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee is an individual appointed by the Department of Justice to oversee the administration of a chapter 7 bankruptcy case. The trustee’s main duty is to examine the debtor under oath to determine whether or not there are any assets to be administered for the benefit of creditors. In most chapter 7 bankruptcy cases, there are no assets for a trustee to administer. This is because the state of Illinois exemption laws provide debtors with the ability to protect a specific amount of personal property while going through the bankruptcy process. However, the trustee also has avoidance powers. These powers give him the ability to undo certain transactions if it was done under two specific scenarios: 1) Fraudulent Transfers -- an act(s) made with actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors, and 2) Transferred Asset For Less Than Fair Market Value – an act(s) made for less than the fair market value by a debtor who was insolvent at the time of the transfer.
If you would like more details, please do not hesitate to call our office. Our office has been successful in helping consumers with collection problems for over 28 years. If you have a debt or tax problem, please contact me at (847) 705-9698 or thughes@lavellelaw.com
and find out how. we can help you. We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code.
More News & Resources
Lavelle Law News and Events
Due to Lavelle’s extensive knowledge in estate and gift tax, we were able to generate a combined federal and Illinois estate tax savings of $1 million for the client.
Do you know it’s a felony in Illinois if you record a conversation without consent? The Illinois Eavesdropping Statute prohibits the secret recording of private conversations without the consent of all parties involved. Protect yourself – Get consent before you hit record! Nataly Kaiser explains.
Summer Special! - Now through 10-1-25, Lavelle Law is offering a special discounted rate on powers of attorney for college-bound students and young adults. Don't send your child to college without POA docs in place! Contact Attorney Luthringshausen to start the process. jluthringshausen@lavellelaw.com or 847-705-7555
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), enacted on July 4, 2025, as Pub. L. No. 119-21, permanently extends and modifies key provisions from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) while introducing new tax benefits and limitations. The law affects individuals, seniors, children, businesses, and charitable organizations.
Lavelle Law Shareholder Steven Migala and DHJJ Financial Principal Ed Brooks join host Jim Mitchell for an in-depth look at the new U.S. tax legislation, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, and discuss how it will impact both businesses and individuals.
Lavelle Law Shareholder Steven Migala and DHJJ Financial Principal Ed Brooks join host Jim Mitchell for an in-depth look at the new U.S. tax legislation, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, and discuss how it will impact both businesses and individuals.
In the United States, the "American Rule" generally requires each party in a legal dispute to cover their own attorney's fees, regardless of the case's outcome. However, exceptions exist where a judge may order one party to pay the other's attorney’s fees in specific circumstances. Sarah Reusché explains.
In commercial leases, particularly those involving retail or office spaces, tenants typically pay not only base rent but also a share of additional operating expenses. These include Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges, property taxes, and insurance premiums. The reconciliation of these expenses is a key process.
Attorneys drafting or reviewing indemnification clauses and notice provisions in a sale or acquisition governed by Delaware law should be aware of the recent Delaware Supreme Court decision in Thompson Street Capital Partners IV L.P. v. Sonova U.S. Hearing Instruments, LLC.
Beginning July 1, Illinois residents will face a series of tax increases related to the Fiscal Year 2026 budget, which takes effect from July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2026. These increases are from the $55+B state budget that is supposed to generate $700+M of new taxes ranging from gasoline, short-term rentals, and more.
