CHICAGO: 312 332 7555 SCHAUMBURG: 847 705 7555
Blog Post
IRS Practice and Procedure News Briefs for March 2020
Joshua A. Nesser • Mar 26, 2020
EXTENSION OF TAX FILING AND PAYMENT DEADLINES – IRS Notice 2020-18
Why this Notice is Important:
This notice is one of the many steps the federal government has taken in an effort to relieve the economic and other burdens individuals and businesses are facing as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Effect of Notice:
As most everyone knows, individual and C corporation tax returns and payments generally are due April 15 of each year. In light of the economic crisis the country is facing, the government announced that any person or entity (including corporations, trusts, and estates) with a tax return due April 15, 2020, is granted an automatic 90-day extension on filing and
payment. This means that 2019 income tax returns and payments that would have been due April 15, 2020, are now due July 15, 2020. Taxpayers will be able to request filing extensions beyond July 15 using normal procedures. The extension also applies to the 2020 first quarter tax deposit that was due April 15, 2020, which now is due July 15, 2020. However, the deadline for the second quarter deposit (June 15, 2020) remains in place.
CORPORATE PENALTY ABATEMENT– Hunter Maintenance and Leasing Corp. Inc. v. United States, US District Court ND Ill., Case No. 1:18-cv-06585 (2020)
Why this Case is Important:
When taxpayers incur IRS late-filing and late-payment penalties, one of the first things they ask often is whether the penalties can be waived. This case provides a good summary of the law of penalty abatements and is a good example of why corporate tax penalties rarely are waived.
Facts:
Hunter
involved an S corporation with 9 shareholders. Between 2011 and 2013, while Christopher Cacciatore was the company’s president and a 50% shareholder, Victor Cacciatore acted as its CEO and board chairman, with control over all of the company’s financial and tax functions. The company’s outside accountant, George Tapling, functioned as the company’s CFO, with sole responsibility for preparing and filing its tax returns. Victor was diagnosed with cancer in 2008 or 2009, was incapacitated during the years at issue, and passed away in late 2013. Tapling also was diagnosed with cancer in 2010 and passed away in 2016. During the years in question, he maintained his CFO responsibilities but, unbeknownst to the company, stopped filing its tax returns in 2010. Following his death, the company discovered the lack of filings. When the IRS assessed late filing penalties and interest totaling over $58,000, the taxpayer requested a penalty abatement based on the illnesses of Victor and Tapling. The IRS denied this request and, after paying the penalty, the taxpayer filed a petition for a refund.
Law and Conclusion:
Section 6699 of the Internal Revenue Code imposes a late-filing penalty in the event that an S corporation fails to file its annual Form 1120S on a timely basis. However, this penalty does not apply to the extent that the late filing was due to “reasonable cause” and not willful neglect. Reasonable cause exists if the taxpayer exercised “ordinary business care and prudence” but nevertheless could not file or pay the tax when due. On the other hand, willful neglect means a “conscious, intentional failure or reckless indifference.” The company argued that it acted with reasonable cause by relying on its outside CFO, Tapling, to timely file its returns, and that the illnesses of Victor and Tapling “incapacitated” the company to the point that it could not comply with its filing obligations. The Court found that those individuals’ illnesses did not incapacitate the company, as it still had a fully functioning president and other board members who had responsibility for ensuring the company’s tax compliance. It also held that a company does not exercise ordinary business care and prudence where it delegates all responsibility for tax compliance to one individual without any oversight. That being the case, it determined that the company did not act with reasonable cause and found in favor of the IRS.
If you would like more details about these cases, please contact me at 312-888-4113 or jnesser@lavellelaw.com.
More News & Resources
Lavelle Law News and Events
On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), in a 3-2 vote, issued its final Non-Compete Clause Rule (“Rule”) which prohibits noncompete clauses in agreements between employees and their workers. This highly anticipated Rule follows a substantially similar proposed rule from the FTC released on January 19, 2023. The Rule will not become effective until 120 days after publication in the Federal Register, and covered employers will be required to comply with the Rule by that effective date, which could come as early as August of this year. By the FTC’s estimate, this ban could affect up to one in five American workers.
When determining how to distribute the marital assets between parties to a divorce, the division of an interest in a small or medium business owned by one or both of the parties is more complex and requires a careful examination of the value of the business or business interests. The Court must determine the value of the business interest in order to determine how to equitably divide all marital assets in which the parties have an interest. The Court will regularly rely on the valuation reports of the parties' experts regarding the value of the business. The business valuation expert will utilize a number of different methods in determining the value of a business. The professional appraiser will examine and assess the value of the business and provide expert testimony and reports to the parties and the Court.
Vehicle dealerships particularly have recently found themselves needing to navigate the complex terrain of adhering to the BIPA’s stringent requirements to avoid being targeted through lawsuits. There has been a recent noticeable uptick in class action lawsuits under the BIPA, serving as a critical wake-up call for the automotive retail industry, highlighting the need for dealerships to review and enhance their practices if they are using biometric technology.
Join us for this seminar as Lavelle Law attorneys Kelly Anderson and Chance Badertscher will unpack the complexities of Illinois commercial leases in order to prepare you for strong leasing relationships.
Between the state of Illinois and federal courts, there are well over 200 statutes that deal with fee shifting provisions. They lay out ways in which legal fees may become the responsibility of one party in a lawsuit. In this video, Lavelle Law Associates Jodie Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek discuss ways that these provisions should be included in contracts and how they can be used advantageously.
Lavelle Law real estate attorney, Chance Badertscher, recently participated in a Straight Up Chicago Investor Podcast and shared his expertise on what to expect on the final walkthrough before your real estate closing. He breaks it down and shares tips for both the buyer and the seller.
Between the state of Illinois and federal courts, there are well over 200 statutes which deal with fee shifting provisions. They lay out ways in which legal fees may become the responsibility of one party in a lawsuit. Lavelle Law Associates Jodie Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek discuss ways that these provisions should be included in contracts and how they can be used advantageously.
Our team worked very quickly (in a matter of just a few days) to establish temporary guardianship of the client, and – most importantly – successfully argued for the judge to authorize the guardian to execute and finalize the estate plan documents on the client’s behalf. Finalizing the estate planning documents in advance of the client’s death saved the estate and the client’s family nearly $500,000 in estate taxes.
Businesses classified as medical spas have a variety of special considerations that must be adhered to in the state of Illinois. In this video, Lavelle Law attorney Eso Akunne discusses critical issues that must be met to operate with state laws. If you are interested in getting involved in this rapidly growing industry be sure to watch this video.
The IRS recently announced that almost 940,000 people across the nation have unclaimed refunds for tax year 2020 but face a May 17 deadline to submit their tax returns. The IRS estimates more than $1 billion in refunds remain unclaimed because people have not filed their 2020 tax returns yet. The average median refund is $932 for 2020. The IRS estimates that about 36,200 Illinois taxpayers may lose $40,608,000 in potential refunds.
STAY UP TO DATE
Subscribe to our newsletter
OUR LOCATIONS
Phone: 312 332 7555
Fax: 312 332 4611
Fax: 847 705 9960
Created by Olive + Ash.
Managed by Olive Street Design. 