Banking and Business Monthly – January 2022

Steven A. Migala • January 19, 2022

Final Guidance on LIBOR/IBOR Transition

A man in a suit and tie is writing in a notebook.


On December 30, 2021, the Treasury Department and IRS issued final regulations to address the taxability of modifications that replace LIBOR or another interbank offered rate (“IBOR”) with a qualified rate such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”). See https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-01-04/pdf/2021-28452.pdf. These final regulations apply to all modifications, whether effected through an amendment, an exchange, a retirement and reissuance, or otherwise, and to all “contracts,” which are defined broadly to include all debt, equity, and derivative instruments. These modifications will take effect 60 days following the publication of the regulations in the federal register on January 4, 2022.

 

Under the final regulations, a covered modification is not treated as the “exchange for other property differing materially in kind,” and therefore is not taxable. A covered modification includes any modification where:

 

  1. The terms of the contract are modified to replace an operative rate that uses a discontinued IBOR with a qualified rate and any related modifications;
  2. The terms of the contract are modified to add a qualified rate as a fallback to an operative rate that references a discontinued IBOR and any related modifications; or
  3. The terms of the contract are modified to replace a fallback rate that references a discontinued IBOR with a qualified rate and any related modifications.

 

A discontinued IBOR is any IBOR from the date a regulator announces that the rate will no longer be published until one year after the date the rate is no longer published.

 

A qualified rate is a SOFR-based or other qualified replacement rate, selected or endorsed by the central bank, reserve bank, or similar institution as a replacement for a discontinued IBOR or its currency equivalent in a specific jurisdiction. Qualified rates include these recommended by the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”).

 

Modifications can have covered and non-covered components. Covered modifications can also include a one-time payment, which is a single payment that compensates a party for the difference between the discontinued and the replacement rate. These covered modifications may include technical, administrative, operational, or other associated modifications. Noncovered modifications are any modifications that are not covered modifications. These noncovered modifications must be tested on a standalone basis under the general modification rules to determine whether they cause a taxable event. When a noncovered modification is effected contemporaneously with a covered modification, taxpayers must test the noncovered modification as if the contract already included the covered modification.

 

For further inquiries or questions, please contact me at smigala@lavellelaw.com or at (847) 705-7555. 

More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

The Junk Fee Ban Act and pricing transparency legislation.
By Sarah J. Reusché and Jacob Rotolo April 23, 2025
If enacted, the Junk Fee Ban Act would protect consumers from hidden fees and promote fair business practices in Illinois. While there has yet to be legislation in the proposed Junk Fee Ban Act that excludes dealerships, it will be important to look for future updates on this bill, as Illinois is quickly becoming a hub for vehicle innovation and automotive plant expansion.
Ancillary probate is required when a person dies owning real estate outside of their home state.
By Heather A. McCollum April 21, 2025
When someone passes away owning property in another state, their estate may need to go through ancillary probate—a secondary court process in that state.
$9.9 Million Dollar Purchase of Packaged Multi-Unit Properties
By Commercial Real Estate April 18, 2025
Lavelle Law represented a joint venture in its $9.9 million acquisition of four multi-unit buildings.
Type F Reorg offers a means of achieving structural change while preserving tax continuity
By Steven A. Migala and Nathan P. Toy April 14, 2025
A Type F reorganization (“F Reorg”), governed by Section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Internal Revenue Code, provides a strategically significant mechanism for corporate restructuring. Defined as a “mere change in identity, form, or place of organization of one corporation,” an F Reorg permits a corporation to alter its legal existence while being treated for federal tax purposes as the same entity. This recharacterization allows for the uninterrupted preservation of tax attributes while maintaining shareholder continuity.
Estate Planning for Your Pet: Securing Your Pet’s Future with a Pet Trust
By Jackie R. Luthringshausen April 10, 2025
When it comes to estate planning, most people think about providing for their loved ones—but what about the furry, feathered, or scaled members of your family? In the United States, 68% of households own at least one pet, according to the American Pet Products Association’s 2023-2024 National Pet Owners Survey. For many, pets are more than just companions—they’re family. Ensuring their care after your death or incapacity is a vital part of comprehensive estate planning. In Illinois, a Pet Trust offers a powerful solution to guarantee your pet’s well-being long after you’re gone.
IRS Press Release Addresses Payment Plan Options
By Timothy M. Hughes April 10, 2025
IRS Press Release Addresses Payment Plan Options - A recent press release by the IRS addressed the options that are available to taxpayers who may owe more on April 15th than they can pay. The IRS advised taxpayers that they do not need to wait until April 15 to file their 2024 federal return, and if they owe and are unable to pay the balance in full, there are payment plans available to help them pay their tax obligation.
Learn about essential legal protections to strengthen your business and safeguard your interests.
By Lavelle Law April 9, 2025
Join us on May 21 in Schaumburg for an engaging Breakfast Briefs seminar, delving into vital strategies to fortify your business. This session will explore the critical role of crafting ironclad non-compete agreements, shielding your trade secrets, and mastering the nuances of temporary restraining orders (TROs) and injunctive relief. Our presenters, attorneys Matthew Sheahin and Jennifer Tee, bring a wealth of experience in this legal domain. Seize this chance to bolster your company’s legal protections and lay a solid groundwork for enduring success!
FinCEN Eliminates BOI Reporting Obligations!
By Frank P. Portera March 25, 2025
On March 21, 2025, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued its interim final rule stating that those entities previously classified as "domestic reporting companies" are now exempt from all BOI reporting requirements. On the other hand, all foreign entities registered to do business in the USA must file their own initial BOI reports within 30 days of the initial final rule's publication, if they have not done so already.
Join us April 3, 2025 for Business After Hours 5-7 PM
By Lavelle Law March 19, 2025
Spring is here, and with baseball season kicking off, we’re stepping up to the plate with our annual Lavelle Law Business After Hours event. We’re excited to partner with our friends in the Schaumburg business community for an evening of networking, good vibes, and a few surprises—all hosted in the friendly confines of our Schaumburg office. Bonus points: Feel free to rock your favorite baseball team’s gear and show off your fandom while you’re at it!
Delaware Court  Provides the Standard of Supreme Review for the Redomestication of Corporations
By Steven A. Migala and Anthony Letto March 12, 2025
Delaware corporations seeking to redomesticate to another state should be advised that on February 4, 2025, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Palkon v. Maffei, C.A. No. 2023-0449-JTL, addressing a challenge to TripAdvisor's redomestication from a Delaware corporation to a Nevada corporation. The case raised important questions regarding the standard of review applicable to such reincorporations, particularly when fiduciaries may derive a benefit from shifting to a legal regime perceived as more friendly.
More Posts