Blog Post

Avoid the Unforced Error: Simple Steps to Prevent Waiving the Attorney-Client Privilege

Brian J. Massimino • Jul 15, 2020
Question: What do tennis, pickleball, politics, and the attorney-client privilege all have in common?  

Answer: Unforced errors.  
Merriam-Webster defines an "unforced error" as "a missed shot or lost point (as in tennis) that is entirely a result of the player's own blunder and not because of the opponent's skill or effort".

In the context of the attorney-client privilege (“ACP”), a frequent blunder involves forfeiting the ACP. In many instances, those communications are of a sensitive nature and the blunder is almost entirely avoidable. This article aims to provide guidance to prevent some of the more common unforced errors.

Before unpacking the frequent errors, a brief overview of the ACP, its purpose and elements will set the stage. The ACP exists to “prevent the disclosure in judicial proceedings of the communications between the attorney and the client.” People v. Radojcic, 2012 IL App (1st) 102698, ¶ 14, 969 N.E.2d 501, 505, aff'd, 2013 IL 114197, ¶ 14, 998 N.E.2d 1212.

The purpose of the ACP is to “encourage and promote full and frank consultation between a client and legal advisor by removing the fear of compelled disclosure of information.” Consolidation Coal Co. v. Bucyrus-Erie Co., 89 Ill. 2d 103, 117–18, 432 N.E.2d 250, 256 (1982). Needless to say, an attorney would be limited in what he or she can do to assist a client if the client hesitates disclosing all the necessary information to the attorney.  

To receive protection of the ACP, the party claiming the ACP must show that (1) the statement originated in confidence that it would not be disclosed; (2) it was made to an attorney acting in his legal capacity for the purpose of securing legal advice or services; and (3) it remained confidential. Pietro v. Marriott Senior Living Servs., Inc., 348 Ill. App. 3d 541, 551, 810 N.E.2d 217, 226 (2004).

It is worth noting that payment to an attorney is not necessary to establish the ACP. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 580 F.2d 1311, 1317 (7th Cir. 1978). Similarly, execution of a contract with an attorney is not required to establish ACP. Id. This allows clients to maintain the ACP during the process of interviewing attorneys. 

It is also worth noting that the termination of the attorney-client relationship does not terminate the ACP. Rather, the attorney-client privilege survives the termination of the relationship. People v. Ryan, 30 Ill.2d 456, 197 N.E.2d 15 (1964).

With this in mind, let’s address some common unforced errors in the ACP.

ERROR #1: Sharing an attorney's communications or advice with a third person.

One of the essential elements of ACP is that the privileged communication “remains confidential.” Without this element, one must assume that the ACP does not attach. Sharing an attorney’s communication or advice with a third party is a common (and most unfortunate) unforced error. This type of error is common in business transactions. In an effort to further the negotiations of the transaction, a client simply forwards an email from her attorney to the other party to the transaction. In doing so, the client has made a significant mistake. Such a disclosure “almost invariably surrenders the privilege.” United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225, 239, 95 S.Ct. 2160, 45 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975).  

PREVENTING THE ERROR: Do not send or otherwise share any communication or advice with another person unless specifically instructed by your attorney.

ERROR #2: Assuming that ACP attaches to all communications to an attorney. 

Often clients believe that anything that they send to their attorney is automatically protected by the ACP. This is not the case, and failing to understand this underpins other unforced errors. Courts are wise to the strategies and tactics that less than scrupulous attorneys and clients have utilized to exploit ACP protections. Courts have said that the ACP “would never be construed to allow a client to funnel papers and documents into the hands of its lawyers for custodial purposes and thereby avoid disclosure.” Radiant Burners, Inc. v. American Gas Ass'n, 320 F.2d 314, 324 (7th Cir.1963). 

Similarly, the simple act of copying your attorney on an otherwise non-privileged communication, will not transform that communication or attachment into a privileged one. Lee v. Chicago Youth Centers, 304 F.R.D. 242, 248 (N.D. Ill. 2014), objections sustained in part and overruled in part (Aug. 6, 2014).

PREVENTING THE ERROR: Appreciate the nuances and the essential elements of the ACP. It may be wise to simply get on the phone with your attorney to discuss the matter before clicking send on an email.

ERROR #3: Communicating with an attorney in the presence of a third party.

When a client voluntarily discloses information to an attorney in the presence of third parties who are not agents of either the client or the attorney, the information is not privileged. In re Himmel, 125 Ill.2d 531, 533 N.E.2d 790, 794, 127 Ill. Dec. 708 (1988).

There are some notable exceptions to this rule. If the other elements of the attorney-client privilege are met, the ACP extends to representatives of the lawyer, including associates, paralegals, secretaries, and investigators. People v. Knippenberg, 66 Ill.2d 276, 362 N.E.2d 681, 684, 6 Ill.Dec. 46 (1977).

PREVENTING THE ERROR: Maintain the ACP by insisting the communications with your attorney and his or her agents and coworkers are conducted without others present. This work merely scratches the surface of issues related to the ACP. Hopefully, it provides enough insight to rethink practices that lead to these unforced errors.

If you would like to learn more about this topic, please contact the author, attorney Brian Massimino, at (312) 736-1262 or at bmassimino@lavellelaw.com.




More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

Major life events, shifts in financial status, and changes in the law can affect your estate plan.
By Heather A. McCollum and Gabriel Kokoszka 26 Mar, 2024
Spring has sprung! Earlier than we’re used to, maybe, and with some backsliding into the unexpectedly frigid March days here and there, but sprung nonetheless! This spring, the cleaning you need to worry about most might not be finally scrubbing down those gross shower tiles: you may need to worry about keeping your estate plan fresh. This is because, contrary to what many assume, creating an estate plan is *not* a “one-and-done” legal activity. Major life events, shifts in financial status, and changes in the applicable law can all affect your estate plan, and those changes may require you to make some edits to your documents. So, this spring, dust off your estate plan and consider the following:
Listen to this podcast if you are considering setting up a medical spa in Illinois.
By Eso H. Akunne 25 Mar, 2024
Businesses classified as medical spas have a variety of special considerations that must be adhered to in the state of Illinois. In this discussion, Lavelle Law attorney Eso Akunne discusses critical issues that must be met to operate with state laws.
Adjustments are coming to the compensation structure for realtors representing sellers and buyers.
By Kelly A. Anderson and Gabriel Kokoszka 20 Mar, 2024
Homebuyers and sellers, rejoice? A settlement reached out of Missouri last week is poised to upend a longstanding, expensive norm in residential real estate: the dreaded 6 percent sales commission.
Enforcement of an Oral Settlement Agreement
By Litigation Team 15 Mar, 2024
Lavelle Law represented a commercial lessee in a $6MM federal court foreclosure and won the Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement. It is rare to have to file a motion to enforce a settlement that is not the subject of a formal settlement agreement signed by the parties.
The CFPB’s New Rule Regulating Credit Card Late Fees
By Steven A. Migala 12 Mar, 2024
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) announced a regulatory amendment on March 5, 2024, targeting credit card late fees, a significant move poised to alter the financial landscape for both consumers and credit card issuers. Under this new rule, the maximum allowable late fee chargeable by large credit card issuers is significantly reduced to $8. This decision follows a proposal released in March 2023 and will take effect 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.
IRS Issues News Release to Debunk Myths about Receiving a Form 1099-K
By Timothy M. Hughes 10 Mar, 2024
This month the IRS released a news release trying to resolve confusion over the reporting requirements related to Form 1099-K, Payment Card and Third Party Network Transactions. The Form’s use has been the subject of much misinformation, so without further ado here is the list:
A Must-Watch for Business Owners and Their Advisors
By Frank J. Portera 08 Mar, 2024
As of January 1, 2024, most businesses in the U.S. are required to comply with the Corporate Transparency Act. In this video, Lavelle Law attorney Frank Portera shares important details about the new Act and how it impacts businesses. He will cover the scope of the Act, deadlines, requirements, and penalties. If you own even a portion of a business, this is an important topic for you to learn about.
Learn about the new federal law, the Corporate Transparency Act, and its reporting requirements.
By Frank J. Portera 07 Mar, 2024
Beginning January 1, 2024, most businesses in the U.S. are required to comply with the Corporate Transparency Act. In this podcast, Lavelle Law attorney Frank Portera shares important details about the new Act and how it impacts businesses. He will cover the scope of the Act, deadlines, requirements, and penalties. If you own even a portion of a business, this is an important topic for you to learn about.
Join us on April 4, 2024, for Business After Hours!
By Lavelle Law 04 Mar, 2024
BATTER UP! It’s that time of year again… springtime, baseball, and the Lavelle Law Business After Hours event. Join us as we team up with our Schaumburg business friends to meet, greet, and network in the friendly confines of our Schaumburg office.
Understanding Chicago's Proposed Referendum: “Amending the Real Estate Transfer Tax”
By Kelly A. Anderson and Gabriel Kokoszka 27 Feb, 2024
Understand the Referendum: “Amending the Real Estate Transfer Tax!” Chicago residents participating in the March 19th primary will walk into the voting booths expecting to make consequential decisions about their nominees for President and States Attorney. But, the typical voter may find themselves slightly confused and overwhelmed when they reach a lengthy referendum at the end of their ballot, entitled “Amending the Real Estate Transfer Tax.” This referendum is four entire paragraphs of tax jargon and financial chatter, informing the reader about a ballot measure on a local tax change.
More Posts
Share by: