Blog Post

You Can Go Your Own Way—Once a Judge Weighs In

Annette K. Corrigan • Jun 27, 2023

Illinois’ Relocation Requirements for Parents of Minors

Americans relocate for many reasons, ranging from family obligations to the pursuit of exciting new career opportunities. Especially with the rise of “work-from-home” jobs, more people than ever are feeling empowered to make big moves in pursuit of, among other things, pleasant weather, family proximity, or increased quality of life. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, nearly 7.9 million people moved between states in 2021, up from almost 7.4 million in 2019 and this increase does not take into account moves from city to city within the same state.



As exciting as a fresh start can be, there is no doubt that a residential move is always stressful, inherently involving meticulous planning and logistics. If you couple that with child custody considerations in the State of Illinois, it would be wise to make sure that this meticulous planning involves consulting with an attorney—or you may run the risk of violating the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (“IMDMA”).


Under the IMDMA, the distribution of parenting time may be modified at any time upon a showing of “changed circumstances that necessitates modification to serve the best interests of the child”. (750 ILCS 5/610.5) The Act states clearly that a relocation by a parent constitutes changed circumstances. (750 ILCS 5/609.2) Despite its name, the Act applies to any parent with allocated parenting time of a minor child, not just divorced couples.


What does it mean to “relocate”? It does not only mean a move out-of-state. The Act defines “relocation” as any move involving:


  1. A change of residence from the child’s current primary residence located in the county of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, or Will to a new residence within this State that is more than 25 miles from the child’s current residence, as measured by an Internet mapping service;
  2. A change of residence from the child’s current primary residence located in a county not listed in paragraph (1) to a new residence within this State that is more than 50 miles from the child’s current primary residence, as measured by an Internet mapping service; or
  3. A change of residence from the child’s current primary residence to a residence outside the borders of this State that is more than 25 miles from the current primary residence, as measured by an Internet mapping service.


750 ILCS 5/600. 


If you think your upcoming move is going to fall into one of the three categories listed, then your parenting time agreement is subject to modification due to these changed circumstances. This then means that if you are a parent with full or equal parenting time under your parenting agreement seeking to relocate with your child, you are required by law to provide written notice (sent to the other parent, AND filed with the court) notifying them that you intend to relocate. 750 ILCS 5/609.2. You are to include in the notice the date of your move, where exactly you are moving to, and for how long. Id.


If your co-parent consents to the relocation, the two of you will draw up an updated parenting plan for the court, easy as can be. However, if your co-parent refuses to consent, you will be obligated to file a petition with the court seeking the judge’s permission to relocate with your child. Id.


As part of the process, you and your lawyer will need to explain why this relocation is in the “best interest of the child,” which is the enduring legal standard for determining issues of parental allocation and child welfare. The Act directs judges who are confronted with relocation to consider eleven different factors:


  1. The circumstances and reasons for the intended relocation;
  2. The reasons, if any, why a parent is objecting to the intended relocation;
  3. The history and quality of each parent’s relationship with the child and specifically whether a parent has substantially failed or refused to exercise the parental responsibilities allocated to him or her under the parenting plan or allocation judgment;
  4. The educational opportunities for the child at the existing location and at the proposed new location;
  5. The presence or absence of extended family at the existing location and at the proposed new location;
  6. The anticipated impact of the relocation on the child;
  7. Whether the court will be able to fashion a reasonable allocation of parental responsibilities between all parents if the relocation occurs;
  8. The wishes of the child, taking into account the child’s maturity and ability to express reasoned and independent preferences as to relocation;
  9. Possible arrangements for the exercise of parental responsibilities appropriate to the parents’ resources and circumstances and the developmental level of the child;
  10. Minimization of the impairment to a parent-child relationship caused by a parent’s relocation; and
  11. Any other relevant factors bearing on the child’s best interests.


750 ILCS 5/609.2


When representing you in this type of dispute, I would sit down with you and develop a plan to explain why your circumstances weigh towards a relocation being the best thing for your child. Courts are mindful that the consideration of a unique child's best interest cannot be reduced to a simple bright-line test, and the special case-by-case circumstances of each individual family will always be considered. Siegel v. Siegel, 2021 IL App (5th) 210197-U, ¶ 64.


It is essential that you work to follow the letter of the law in the delicate area of co-parenting disputes; understandably, judges often look harshly upon parents who move their child unannounced, without giving formal notice to their co-parent and the court. Remember, your co-parent has rights too.


If you (or your co-parent) are considering a big move and you have questions regarding your allocation of parenting time, your rights under your unique parenting arrangement, or other topics relating to family law, please reach out to the attorneys at Lavelle Law at 847-705-7555, or email Attorney Annette Corrigan at acorrigan@lavellelaw.com to schedule your free and confidential consultation to discuss your options.


More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

Understanding the FTC’s Nationwide Ban on Noncompete Agreements
By Steven A. Migala 03 May, 2024
On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), in a 3-2 vote, issued its final Non-Compete Clause Rule (“Rule”) which prohibits noncompete clauses in agreements between employees and their workers. This highly anticipated Rule follows a substantially similar proposed rule from the FTC released on January 19, 2023. The Rule will not become effective until 120 days after publication in the Federal Register, and covered employers will be required to comply with the Rule by that effective date, which could come as early as August of this year. By the FTC’s estimate, this ban could affect up to one in five American workers.
Divorces that involve small and medium businesses have unique concerns and considerations.
By Joseph A. Olszowka 02 May, 2024
When determining how to distribute the marital assets between parties to a divorce, the division of an interest in a small or medium business owned by one or both of the parties is more complex and requires a careful examination of the value of the business or business interests. The Court must determine the value of the business interest in order to determine how to equitably divide all marital assets in which the parties have an interest. The Court will regularly rely on the valuation reports of the parties' experts regarding the value of the business. The business valuation expert will utilize a number of different methods in determining the value of a business. The professional appraiser will examine and assess the value of the business and provide expert testimony and reports to the parties and the Court.
Vehicle dealerships need to navigate the complex terrain of adhering to BIPA to avoid lawsuits.
By Sarah J. Reusché and Nathan Toy 30 Apr, 2024
Vehicle dealerships particularly have recently found themselves needing to navigate the complex terrain of adhering to the BIPA’s stringent requirements to avoid being targeted through lawsuits. There has been a recent noticeable uptick in class action lawsuits under the BIPA, serving as a critical wake-up call for the automotive retail industry, highlighting the need for dealerships to review and enhance their practices if they are using biometric technology.
Learn the complexities of Illinois commercial leases and avoid common pitfalls.
By Lavelle Law 29 Apr, 2024
Join us for this seminar as Lavelle Law attorneys Kelly Anderson and Chance Badertscher will unpack the complexities of Illinois commercial leases in order to prepare you for strong leasing relationships.
An essential part of a good contract is often overlooked. Learn about fee shifting provisions.
By Joseph O. Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek 23 Apr, 2024
Between the state of Illinois and federal courts, there are well over 200 statutes that deal with fee shifting provisions. They lay out ways in which legal fees may become the responsibility of one party in a lawsuit. In this video, Lavelle Law Associates Jodie Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek discuss ways that these provisions should be included in contracts and how they can be used advantageously.
Great advice on what to expect on your final walkthrough.
By Chance W. Badertscher 22 Apr, 2024
Lavelle Law real estate attorney, Chance Badertscher, recently participated in a Straight Up Chicago Investor Podcast and shared his expertise on what to expect on the final walkthrough before your real estate closing. He breaks it down and shares tips for both the buyer and the seller.
An essential part of a good contract is often overlooked. Learn about fee shifting provisions.
By Joseph O. Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek 18 Apr, 2024
Between the state of Illinois and federal courts, there are well over 200 statutes which deal with fee shifting provisions. They lay out ways in which legal fees may become the responsibility of one party in a lawsuit. Lavelle Law Associates Jodie Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek discuss ways that these provisions should be included in contracts and how they can be used advantageously.
Emergency Estate Tax Savings - a Lavelle Law Success Story
By Estate Planning and Administration 16 Apr, 2024
Our team worked very quickly (in a matter of just a few days) to establish temporary guardianship of the client, and – most importantly – successfully argued for the judge to authorize the guardian to execute and finalize the estate plan documents on the client’s behalf. Finalizing the estate planning documents in advance of the client’s death saved the estate and the client’s family nearly $500,000 in estate taxes.
Watch this video if you are considering setting up a medical spa in Illinois.
By Eso H. Akunne 12 Apr, 2024
Businesses classified as medical spas have a variety of special considerations that must be adhered to in the state of Illinois. In this video, Lavelle Law attorney Eso Akunne discusses critical issues that must be met to operate with state laws. If you are interested in getting involved in this rapidly growing industry be sure to watch this video.
Time to Claim a Refund Expires on May 17, 2024 Deadline, Then $1 Billion in Refunds Will be Lost.
By Timothy M. Hughes 10 Apr, 2024
The IRS recently announced that almost 940,000 people across the nation have unclaimed refunds for tax year 2020 but face a May 17 deadline to submit their tax returns. The IRS estimates more than $1 billion in refunds remain unclaimed because people have not filed their 2020 tax returns yet. The average median refund is $932 for 2020. The IRS estimates that about 36,200 Illinois taxpayers may lose $40,608,000 in potential refunds.
More Posts
Share by: