LAVELLE
LEGAL
SERVICES,
LTD.
A T T O R N E Y S A N D F I N A N C I A L C O U N S E L O R S |
|||
| | OVERVIEW | PRACTICE | PROFILES | NEWSLETTER | LOCATIONS | LINKS | | |||
|
CHICAGO 208 South LaSalle Street Suite 1200 Chicago, IL 60604 312.332.7555
PALATINE 501 West Colfax Palatine, IL 60067 847.705.7555
BENSENVILLE 1035 South York Road Bensenville, IL 60106 630.238.8616
HOFFMAN ESTATES 2200 W. Higgins Suite 115 Hoffman Estates, IL 60195 847.705.7555
LAKE FOREST 1401 Northwestern Lake Forest, IL 60045 847.482.9740
|
NEWSLETTERS
/
Winter 1997
Estate Planning/Divorce:
For estate planning clients, we often recommend irrevocable life insurance trusts in order to create a funding
pool to pay an estate tax bill or, at a minimum, to convert assets that would otherwise be taxed in the estate
of the decedent to assets that would not be included in the taxable estate of the decedent.
Often clients are unwilling to accept the fact that the death benefit of a life insurance policy, when not
purchased through a certain type of trust, is included in the taxable estate of the decedent. To
avoid this onerous result, we simply set up irrevocable life insurance trusts ("ILIT") naming someone
other than the grantor as the beneficiary. This way, upon the death of the grantor, the death benefit is
not included in the taxable estate.
With respect to divorce planning, Section 503(g) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act
clearly permits the court to establish a trust or a separate "fund" from a portion of the jointly
held assets "to protect and promote the best interests of the children." However, Section 503(g)
trusts can be ordered only if the court finds that a trust or a separate fund is necessary to protect or
promote the best interests of the children. Facts necessary to give rise to a court order for a Section 503(g)
trust are when there has been a history of payment problems or otherwise irresponsible behavior. Section
510(d) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act provides that a parent's support obligations
continue after death: the deceased parent's estate is responsible for any support obligation ("to the
extent just and appropriate in the circumstances"). Nonetheless, the court has the authority to order a
party to maintain life insurance only during the period for which that party is obligated to make payments.
In re Marriage of Rogliano, 198 Ill. App. 3d 404 (1990). As a very practical negotiating matter,
simply purchasing a life insurance policy does not resolve sufficient issues. For example, when the proceeds
are paid in a lump sum, will there be enough money? Who will manage it? How will the proceeds be invested? How
will they be used? How will the custodial parent be able to use the money for the benefit of the child? If the
child can access the money at age 18, what will guarantee that the funds will be used to pay for college?
It is well advised that ILIT offer a creative solution to secure the child's support and answer the above
questions. Divorce lawyers should consider the following in the life insurance trust discussion analysis: (1)
what type of life insurance (term, whole life, universal life); (2) how often should the responsible person
make premium payments to the trust; (3) the child's age should reflect the necessity of the death benefit --
usually, the older the child, the less the death benefit needs to be; (4) who will be named as the trustee,
the successor trustee, and always, institutional trustee; (5) provide that the trustee use the life insurance
proceeds to make all child support payments that would have been made had the obligor lived; (6) negotiate the
education requirements of the trust -- is college and post-graduate education included? when will the trust be
liquidated?
At a minimum, the analysis required to draft a proper ILIT raises the level of understanding between the
parties regarding the support of the minor children.
|
||
|
copyright © 2003
lavelle legal services, ltd. |
|||