|
Lavelle Legal Services, Ltd. | ||
West Suburban: 1035 South York Road Bensenville, Illinois 60106 Telephone (630) 238-8616 |
Attorneys and Financial Counselors 501 West Colfax Palatine, Illinois 60067 Telephone: (847) 705-7555 Facsimile: (847) 705-9960 |
N.W. Suburban: 2200 W. Higgins Road, Suite 115 Hoffman Estates, Illinois 60195 Telephone (847) 882-4224 |
|
Chicago Office 208 South La Salle Street Chicago, Illinois 60604-1003 Telephone: (312) 332-7555 |
Kerry Lavelle • Timothy Hughes Theodore M. McGinn • Matthew J. Sheahin Cameron R. Monti • Lauren E. Schaaf Julie M. dombrosky |
North Suburban: 1401 North Western Lake Forest, Illinois 60045 Telephone (847) 482-9740 |
e- NEWSLETTER
April/May 2006
Jessica M. Kirsch
Editor-in-Chief
In the operation of your home
health care business, it is likely you will come into possession of certain
patient private
information.
It is critical that your entity adopt policies to protect such information and
comply with these obligations under applicable law.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of
1996 requires you to protect patients rights and maintain the confidentiality of
private information. Predicated health information includes demographics
information about the patient, name, birth date, dates of service, date of
death, social security numbers, medical record number, and any other unique
identifier health information. The act however does allow you to use the
information to treat a patient, obtain payment for such treatment and to
maintain day to day facility operations. Your agency must have clear policy
procedures concerning such information.
When confronted with the request for information, there are certain steps you must take to comply within the act. First of all, you should verify who is requesting the information. You are permitted only to release information to those parties that are specifically authorized to receive by the patient. The agency is required to provide an accounting to the patient if you make such disclosure pursuant to their request. In addition, the area containing such confidential and private patent information should be maintained secure. The area should not be accessible by visitors or other patients. Finally, the chain of title of any patient record should be maintained to allow tracking of who comes into possession of such patient information. Many times patient information is maintained in digital format or otherwise on a computer. The act requires you to remain security of such information even though it is maintained in a computer. This would include a firewall, protecting internet network confections, using employee passwords and prohibiting text massaging of patient information.
The new act requires home health agencies to maintain the privacy of patient information. Failure to comply with such statute will expose your company to liability as well as penalties with the federal government. Accordingly, it is critical that internal controls and security measures are implemented to protect such information. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Theodore McGinn at tmcginn@lavellelaw.com.

The nation's three major U.S. consumer credit
reporting companies – Equifax, Experian and TransUnion – have agreed to utilize
a new uniform credit score method referred to as "VantageScore," in an effort to
simplify the current credit scoring system for both consumers and grantors of
credit. The new scoring system is proposed to address the potential weakness in
existing and different scoring methods among each of the three credit reporting
agencies. Presently, the credit scores are computed on a scale of roughly 300 to
850. For example, under the past methods, where one credit agency may report
your credit score as on a "good" level, another reporting agency might report
your credit worthiness with a "fair" score based on their individual scoring
method. Thus, depending upon the credit reporting agency of which your credit
grantor inquires, you may or have not have received credit approval or a
favorable interest rate.
However, under the new VantageScore system, the credit
reporting agencies are touting it as a manner to provide consumers and credit
grantor with a consistent scoring method that will be easier to understand and
apply. VantageScore uses score ranges from 501 to 990. Both consumers and credit
grantors will be able to correlate the score groupings with a commonly used
academic grading scale:
Score
Grade
• 901-990 = A
• 801-900 = B
• 701-800 = C
• 601-700 = D
• 501-600 = F
Critics assert that a new credit scoring method will only
serve to confuse consumers after they have just begun to decipher and understand
the old credit scoring system. Irrespective of the scoring method applied, it is
recommended that all consumers receive a copy of their credit report at least
once a year to monitor for reporting errors and to properly manage their credit
worthiness. If you have any questions concerning this article, please email
cmonti@lavellelaw.com.
If the parties to a divorce have significant debts and one party is considering
filing for bankruptcy, the parties should consider whether to file jointly.
However, even if one spouse decides to file and the other spouse declines to
join in the bankruptcy, property divisions and domestic support obligations are
no longer dischargeable debts under the new bankruptcy laws.
Also, past-due support is given first priority payment status
in Chapter 7 bankruptcy and is considered a priority debt and must be paid in
full during the life of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy plan. The maximum length of a
Chapter 13 plan is five years. If the support arrearage is great, it may allow
an individual to file under Chapter 7, whereas he or she might otherwise have to
file under Chapter 13. In a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, it might minimize or
eliminate payments to non-priority unsecured creditors, such as credit card
companies.
Parties thinking about bankruptcy and divorce should seek
counsel to advise them on ways to simplify the issues and allow both parties to
survive financially.
If you have any questions about this article or any other
issue related to divorce or family law matters, please feel free to contact
jdombrosky@lavellelaw.com.
As part of sophisticated estate planning, we
are continually asked questions about "income tax planning" in connection with
estates. The current trend is to try to minimize or "stretch" income taxes
associated with qualified plans and IRAs at the death of the owner.

In 2002 the IRS published final regulations that outlined IRA
beneficiary distribution options and required minimum distributions. Assuming
that trusts met certain requirements, these regulations stated that an IRA trust
beneficiary could take annual minimum distributions over the life of the
benefices with the shortest life expectancy. Pursuant to these
regulations and private letter rulings, the IRS stated that the separate
accounts were not available to trust beneficiaries of an IRA. In each private
letter ruling, the IRA owner named the "master" trust as a beneficiary of the
IRA with instructions to be divided into equal shares and payable into separate
sub-trusts. Here, however, the IRS held that sub-trusts and separate accounts
would not allow the beneficiary of the sub-trusts to use their life
expectancies to calculate minimum distributions. Instead, the IRS forced all of
the trust beneficiaries to take annual minimum distributions over the life on
the beneficiary with the shortest life expectancy.
The IRS recently issued PRL200537004, which allows "separate
share" treatment for the trust beneficiary. In this PRL the IRS will allow the
individual beneficiary of each trust share to use their individual life
expectancy to calculate required minimum distributions for their share of the
IRA. In this case, the IRA owner must expressly name each separate "children's"
trust as a beneficiary of his/her IRA, along with different percentage interest.
Private PRL200537044 provides some positive news for IRA
owners who wish to name the trust as an IRA beneficiary. For questions of estate
and tax planning please don't hesitate to contact Kerry Lavelle at
klavelle@lavellelaw.com.
For past e-newsletter articles of interest, please visit the Lavelle Legal Services, Ltd. website at: http://www.lavellelaw.com/newsletters/newsletter.htm.
|
This newsletter is
a publication of
Lavelle Legal Services, Ltd. We attempt to highlight and
discuss areas of general legal interest that may lead to planning
opportunities. Nothing contained in this Newsletter should be construed as
legal advice or a legal opinion. Consultation with a professional is
recommended before implementing any of the ideas discussed herein.
|